Mobility Site Minute

Mobilitysite Contests

Mobility Site Videos

Mobilitysite Polls

Mobilitysite Reviews

Home » Uncategorized

In-flight cell phone usage…. Good or bad?

Posted by Chris Leckness on January 13, 2006 – 11:05 pm  Share
closeThis post was published 3 years 10 months 6 days ago.
It\'s is possible that the information within this article is now out of date or updated.

I heard earlier today that the FCC will soon be auctioning off the spectrum that will be used for more widely available in-flight Internet connectivity.  They are apparently also still considering whether or not to allow passengers to use cell phones in-flight.

The first time the topic of in-flight cell phone usage came up, I immediately thought it was a bad idea.  It’s annoying enough to listen to the people next to you babble on about their businesses for the length of a flight.  I can’t imagine having to also listen to their phone conversations about God knows what.

Please, FCC…. keep cell phones banned on commercial airliners!

I’m really curious what everyone’s opinions are on this topic.  Please post comments with your thoughts on in-flight cell phone usage. 

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm Post to StumbleUpon

Chris Leckness (3547 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Chris Leckness is the Owner/Administrator of Mobilitysite. He is a Microsoft MVP, Mobile Devices and a member of the exclusive focus group, Mobius. Chris runs a Mobilitysite, GotZune, and a few other smaller sites and blogs. His personal blog is chris.leckness.com.





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.

  • Robert
    Someone mentioned that cell phones didn't work because the planes were often too high to be picked up by the satellites, but that raises an interesting question. During 9-11, several people on that doomed flight called to report what was going on. Our paper said they used cell phones from the restroom or place where the hijackers were not looking.

    Anyone know if that was true?

    Robert
  • WORD-SMITH
    I hope those limitations are correct. It's already wa-a-ay too annoying in restaurants and even movie theaters. Sorry but your fellow man is too egocentric to "self-regulate". People have to wait til their flight is over to smoke, why not to make--or god forbid--receive 16 psuedo important calls with 300 ring-tones each going off the whole flight. NOBODY'S that important that they can't wait for a phone call. And just how DID we survive all this time?
  • Jordan Wigley
    Howard, good point about trains... but most "long distance" trains generally give a little more "privacy space" for you to go talk on your phone, or to get away from the annoying guy next to you that's talking to his girlfriend loud enough for 50 people around him to hear.

    As for the cellular traffic.... that's what the FCC is considering. They would open up some spectrum for the airliners to connect via satellite to the various cellular networks. It would work similar to the satellite technology being used for in-flight Wi-Fi service.

    Currently, cell phones won't even work on airliners. The plane is at too high of an altitude (usually) to get a good signal. And on top of it, you're passing the towers at such a fast speed that your cell phone can't keep up with the network switchovers.
  • Howard2k
    They're allowed on trains, why not planes?

    As a compromise though, maybe they can have special "quiet sections" where there are no cellphones permitted.

    And let's face it, unless they going to be bridging the cellular traffic over a satellite signal, the "annoyance" factor while flying over the Atlantic will be limited. In fact, I'd assume (but could be wrong) that even given full licence to use our phones it's going to be pretty patch at high speed and high altitude. Perhaps they've come up with some creative ideas to make it work well though.
blog comments powered by Disqus