Celio RedFly in Action
November 7, 2009 – 9:36 pm | Comments

A few days ago I commented about the Celio Redfly adding support for BlackBerrys. I came across that bit of information first while researching to purchase a Celio RedFly myself and then while I’ve been …

Read the full story »
Mobility Site Minute

Check out our podcast, the Mobilitysite Minute. Quick news, views, and interviews.

Mobilitysite Contests

The lastest Mobilitysite.com Contests. What can you win today?

Mobility Site Videos

Video reviews, 1st looks, and demos of the hottest mobile devices.

Mobilitysite Polls

Our polls help get our reader’s take on what’s happening in Mobility.

Mobilitysite Reviews

Mobilitysite reviews take you deep into the hottest mobile devices, software and accessories.

Home » Uncategorized

iPod owner sues Apple.

Posted by Chris Leckness on February 2, 2006 – 11:46 pm
closeThis post was published 3 years 9 months 5 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

ipod.gif OK, if you buy coffee don’t you expect it to be hot?
If you buy a knife, do you assume it could cut you?
So if you buy a music player and cram the buds in your ear and crank it up, do you expect hearing loss? ugh, ya!

We’ve know for a couple years now that LOUD MUSIC can damage your hearing. Just as I know, even though I don’t drink coffee, that its damn hot. So why do you sue McDonald’s when you spill your hot coffee?

"A disgruntled iPod owner has filed a lawsuit against Apple, claiming the device causes hearing loss and that the company does not properly warn users of this danger.

iPods are “inherently defective in design and are not sufficiently adorned with adequate warnings regarding the likelihood of hearing loss”, according to the complaint, which was filed yesterday on behalf of John Kiel Patterson in US District Court in San Jose, California.

The owner, according to iPod website ilounge.com, seeks class action status, demands compensation for unspecified plaintiffs’ damages and upgrades to make iPods safer to use."

Source : Pocket-link.co.uk

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Chris Leckness (3531 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Chris Leckness is the Owner/Administrator of Mobilitysite. He is a Microsoft MVP, Mobile Devices and a member of the exclusive focus group, Mobius. Chris runs a Mobilitysite, GotZune, and a few other smaller sites and blogs. His personal blog is chris.leckness.com.





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.
  • Jim McGowan
    Actually, I used to talk just as bad about the grandmom who sued McDonald's over the hot coffee. But if you ever actually read the facts of the case, you'll rethink the whole thing. Poor woman wasn't trying to fix her coffee in her lap, and didn't sue for as much as was awarded - only for actual hospital bills - she received bad 3rd degree burns. The jury was outraged when they heard the whole story (and actually, so was I!), and over-awarded - which the judge reversed almost immediately, and the woman only received actual damages and a very reasonable punitive award, plus those ever-present legal fees. But in this case, McDonald's really was pretty sucky about the whole thing.
  • Ninja
    Yet more proof that personal responsibility is dead in this country...I hope that Apple fights this every step of the way and that the lawyers cream the idiot on the stand (and anyone else stupid enough to join the class action).
  • David Smith
    This is typical, and should be expected in todays world.
    It's ALWAYS someone elses fault.
    No person should EVER be responsible for their own actions.
    This is AMERICA.
    This is OUR RIGHT.
    ...right....??
  • Bruanor
    you have GOT to be kidding?? I have to say, only in the US :) its people like this who give stupid people a bad name, wasting the courts/peoples time with pointness lawsuits, and all because they know the company in question will settle rather than mess around in court for weeks on end... so its a quick cash grab, and the only real cost is publicly proclaiming how big a tool you are :)

    Bru... angry since '92
blog comments powered by Disqus