<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ActiveSync replaced by Windows Mobile Device Center in Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2006/03/activesync-replaced-by-windows-mobile-device-center-in-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2006/03/activesync-replaced-by-windows-mobile-device-center-in-vista/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:14:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MobileRead</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2006/03/activesync-replaced-by-windows-mobile-device-center-in-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileRead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/?p=474#comment-137</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ActiveSync becomes Vista Mobile Device Center&lt;/strong&gt;

I wonder, is the name changing because the functionality is new, or because people are so frustrated with synching problems with ActiveSync?

Either way, when you move from Windows XP to Windows Vista, be prepared to start using Vista Mobile Device...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ActiveSync becomes Vista Mobile Device Center</strong></p>
<p>I wonder, is the name changing because the functionality is new, or because people are so frustrated with synching problems with ActiveSync?</p>
<p>Either way, when you move from Windows XP to Windows Vista, be prepared to start using Vista Mobile Device&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
