Samsung Intrepid Review
November 27, 2009 – 10:31 am | Comments

This is a review of the Samsung Intrepid from Sprint.  Overall, I liked the phone.  It has a good build, and the software is impressive.  There were a few quirks here and there though.  …

Read the full story »
Home » MID, Opinion, UMPC

What do you prefer for your mobile Internet solution, a shrunken PC or a non-PC?

closeThis post was published 2 years 1 month 19 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

That’s the main question Daniel Gentleman asks readers in a very good article where he explains the differences between UMPCs and MIDs. Even when the title of his article could sound more like a Windows-Linux debate,  it’s more between what works better for you in your everyday Internet Mobile needs, a shrunk PC or a non-PC.  Here is a comparison from Daniel’s article that you can use to find what is better for you.

Now we have two potential mobile Internet solutions: Shrink a PC down to where it is mobile yet still usable (a UMPC) or build a non-PC device from the ground up (a MID or Internet Tablet) specifically for mobile Internet use.
Shrinking a PC

  • Advantages

    • Familiar interface

    • Vast commercial software base (supported by the software developers)

    • Vast expansion options and greater likelihood that your device will have compatible drivers

  • Disadvantages

    • Cost of PC class hardware

    • Cost of commercial operating system license

    • Constant compromises in either speed, size, or battery life. 

Building a mobile Internet device

  • Advantages

    • All hardware, software, and user interaction built to go together

    • Cheaper hardware and no operating system licensing costs

    • Wide community-based software and support

  • Disadvantages

    • Limitations in function

    • Learning curve for new interface and software

    • Often not as user-friendly as full PCs (either in interface or in application support)

Editor’s Note: For me the answer is only one: a UMPC. I need more than Internet even in my daily job as news editor of this and other pages. I need to be able to manipulate pictures, run tools like Windows Live Writer, Frontpage, etc. For me to have a few “ported” applications is not enough if I can have virtually millions of them free or commercial. In my case going with Linux would be like going back to Windows CE. The reason why I bought my first UMPC was because the Pocket PC Platform was not powerful enough to cover all my needs. So… why go back to that same situation but with a different OS, in this case Linux which practically does not have any support.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Rate Post

Worthless PostNot that goodAverage PostGood PostSuper Post (No Ratings Yet)   

Similar Posts

ctitanic (739 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Working as IT Professional since 1994. IT Manager since 1999. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional in Tablet PC/UMPC since 2007. Owner/writer of www.ultramobilepc-tips.com . Published many articles in todoUMPC Magazine, www.todoUMPCmagazine.com, the first online magazine all about UMPCs. Maker of Tweaks2K2, a registry hacking tool for Pocket PC devices (www.tweaks2k2.com).


You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Post Navigation