What do you prefer for your mobile Internet solution, a shrunken PC or a non-PC?
Oct 10th
This post was published 2 years 1 month 19 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.That’s the main question Daniel Gentleman asks readers in a very good article where he explains the differences between UMPCs and MIDs. Even when the title of his article could sound more like a Windows-Linux debate, it’s more between what works better for you in your everyday Internet Mobile needs, a shrunk PC or a non-PC. Here is a comparison from Daniel’s article that you can use to find what is better for you.
Now we have two potential mobile Internet solutions: Shrink a PC down to where it is mobile yet still usable (a UMPC) or build a non-PC device from the ground up (a MID or Internet Tablet) specifically for mobile Internet use.
Shrinking a PC
Advantages
Familiar interface
Vast commercial software base (supported by the software developers)
Vast expansion options and greater likelihood that your device will have compatible drivers
Disadvantages
Cost of PC class hardware
Cost of commercial operating system license
Constant compromises in either speed, size, or battery life.
Building a mobile Internet device
Advantages
All hardware, software, and user interaction built to go together
Cheaper hardware and no operating system licensing costs
Wide community-based software and support
Disadvantages
Limitations in function
Learning curve for new interface and software
Often not as user-friendly as full PCs (either in interface or in application support)
Editor’s Note: For me the answer is only one: a UMPC. I need more than Internet even in my daily job as news editor of this and other pages. I need to be able to manipulate pictures, run tools like Windows Live Writer, Frontpage, etc. For me to have a few “ported” applications is not enough if I can have virtually millions of them free or commercial. In my case going with Linux would be like going back to Windows CE. The reason why I bought my first UMPC was because the Pocket PC Platform was not powerful enough to cover all my needs. So… why go back to that same situation but with a different OS, in this case Linux which practically does not have any support.
Rate Post
Similar Posts
- New Mobile Firefox previews
- MWC: TietoEnator Introduces a Complete Mobile TV Solution for Telecom Operators and Media Companies
- MWC: iDial Mobile Application Displays Mobile Phone User’s Availability, Location and Current Presence
- U.S. Mobile Users Looking for Better Internet Access in Next Mobile Phone Purchase
- CallWave and JAJAH Announce Agreement to Deliver Advanced Internet Telephony Solutions
ctitanic (739 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook
Working as IT Professional since 1994. IT Manager since 1999. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional in Tablet PC/UMPC since 2007. Owner/writer of www.ultramobilepc-tips.com . Published many articles in todoUMPC Magazine, www.todoUMPCmagazine.com, the first online magazine all about UMPCs. Maker of Tweaks2K2, a registry hacking tool for Pocket PC devices (www.tweaks2k2.com).

Follow Us
RSS Feed
Follow on Twitter
Facebook
Watch on YouTube