<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetFront 3.5 First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:03:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-8689</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/#comment-8689</guid>
		<description>I downlaoded the CAB file, but it tells me that it&#039;s &quot;not a valad Windows CE Setup file&quot;

Does it work for Dell Axim X50v?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downlaoded the CAB file, but it tells me that it&#8217;s &#8220;not a valad Windows CE Setup file&#8221;</p>
<p>Does it work for Dell Axim X50v?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>Hi Haesslich,

As I know Flash is already supported on Netfront 3.4. I believe the final version of 3.5 will contain Flash as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Haesslich,</p>
<p>As I know Flash is already supported on Netfront 3.4. I believe the final version of 3.5 will contain Flash as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haesslich</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3241</link>
		<dc:creator>Haesslich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 03:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/#comment-3241</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m running this on an Axim x51v, Jenn - it works bloody fast with WM5, and is a far sight faster than Netfront 3.3 ever was, and is better than 3.4 is at scrolling across pages.  My only complaint so far is that it doesn&#039;t have Flash support, so I can&#039;t test it with other sites like YouTube... but I will say that it moves well.

One other annoyance is that you don&#039;t have Soft Key access, or Bookmark access, in Full Screen Mode.  You have to switch to &#039;Normal View&#039; to get that going, so if it&#039;s not in your history... you&#039;ll have to either enter the page manually, or else type in the first few letters of the URL and hope that NF 3.5 pulls up the right link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running this on an Axim x51v, Jenn &#8211; it works bloody fast with WM5, and is a far sight faster than Netfront 3.3 ever was, and is better than 3.4 is at scrolling across pages.  My only complaint so far is that it doesn&#8217;t have Flash support, so I can&#8217;t test it with other sites like YouTube&#8230; but I will say that it moves well.</p>
<p>One other annoyance is that you don&#8217;t have Soft Key access, or Bookmark access, in Full Screen Mode.  You have to switch to &#8216;Normal View&#8217; to get that going, so if it&#8217;s not in your history&#8230; you&#8217;ll have to either enter the page manually, or else type in the first few letters of the URL and hope that NF 3.5 pulls up the right link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/#comment-3238</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steve! I appreciate all the links :-) 

I enjoyed that Advantage piece and liked how you concluded that while it&#039;s not really a UMPC (in Microsoft and/or x86 terms), it&#039;s YOUR UMPC. Because that&#039;s what it all boils down to in the end, really: what&#039;s right for YOU. Mobile technology is general is all about personal choice for me, so the so-called &quot;perfect&quot; device just varies from person to person.

Thanks again for the overview. I think I&#039;ll give NetFront a spin on the Tilt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steve! I appreciate all the links :-) </p>
<p>I enjoyed that Advantage piece and liked how you concluded that while it&#8217;s not really a UMPC (in Microsoft and/or x86 terms), it&#8217;s YOUR UMPC. Because that&#8217;s what it all boils down to in the end, really: what&#8217;s right for YOU. Mobile technology is general is all about personal choice for me, so the so-called &#8220;perfect&#8221; device just varies from person to person.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the overview. I think I&#8217;ll give NetFront a spin on the Tilt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haesslich</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Haesslich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>Trying it out now.  I can&#039;t wait for Opera 9.5 to show up myself, even if I know it&#039;ll cost me an arm and a leg again to upgrade.  Opera tends to crash, and I&#039;ve been using the NetFront 3.4 TP... which is far, far faster than 3.3 was.  And they&#039;ve already jumped to 3.5.

I wonder if they&#039;ll deploy this on the PSP and other Sony or Sony Ericsson devices soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying it out now.  I can&#8217;t wait for Opera 9.5 to show up myself, even if I know it&#8217;ll cost me an arm and a leg again to upgrade.  Opera tends to crash, and I&#8217;ve been using the NetFront 3.4 TP&#8230; which is far, far faster than 3.3 was.  And they&#8217;ve already jumped to 3.5.</p>
<p>I wonder if they&#8217;ll deploy this on the PSP and other Sony or Sony Ericsson devices soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laser</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>Jenn, you rule!  Thanks for the Opera advice.  By the way, I linked several of your excellent articles here:
http://mobilitysite.com/2008/01/the-ultimate-umpc-is-not-a-umpc/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenn, you rule!  Thanks for the Opera advice.  By the way, I linked several of your excellent articles here:<br />
<a href="http://mobilitysite.com/2008/01/the-ultimate-umpc-is-not-a-umpc/" rel="nofollow">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/01/the-ultimate-umpc-is-not-a-umpc/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-3234</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/02/netfront-35-first-impressions/#comment-3234</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Steve. 

It looks like you&#039;re using the default view mode in Opera. If you select&quot;desktop computer&quot; under the &quot;identify as&quot; setting, you won&#039;t ever have to look at mobile versions of sites again! Desktop mode isn&#039;t well suited for browsing on QVGA screens, but it&#039;s not too bad on the Advantage&#039;s VGA display. Opera Mobile 9.5 and Skyfire should give that assessment a huge boost, so they can&#039;t be released soon enough for me.

Thanks for sharing your initial thoughts on NetFront. What device did you test it on? I thought it was the Advantage, but the screenshots are all 360 x 480. I think I&#039;ll stick with Opera 8.65 on my Advantage until 9.5, Skyfire, and maybe Firefox Mobile are released. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Steve. </p>
<p>It looks like you&#8217;re using the default view mode in Opera. If you select&#8221;desktop computer&#8221; under the &#8220;identify as&#8221; setting, you won&#8217;t ever have to look at mobile versions of sites again! Desktop mode isn&#8217;t well suited for browsing on QVGA screens, but it&#8217;s not too bad on the Advantage&#8217;s VGA display. Opera Mobile 9.5 and Skyfire should give that assessment a huge boost, so they can&#8217;t be released soon enough for me.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your initial thoughts on NetFront. What device did you test it on? I thought it was the Advantage, but the screenshots are all 360 x 480. I think I&#8217;ll stick with Opera 8.65 on my Advantage until 9.5, Skyfire, and maybe Firefox Mobile are released. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
