Celio RedFly in Action
November 7, 2009 – 9:36 pm | Comments

A few days ago I commented about the Celio Redfly adding support for BlackBerrys. I came across that bit of information first while researching to purchase a Celio RedFly myself and then while I’ve been …

Read the full story »
Mobility Site Minute

Check out our podcast, the Mobilitysite Minute. Quick news, views, and interviews.

Mobilitysite Contests

The lastest Mobilitysite.com Contests. What can you win today?

Mobility Site Videos

Video reviews, 1st looks, and demos of the hottest mobile devices.

Mobilitysite Polls

Our polls help get our reader’s take on what’s happening in Mobility.

Mobilitysite Reviews

Mobilitysite reviews take you deep into the hottest mobile devices, software and accessories.

Home » General

Who is guilty, Microsoft or OEMs

Posted by ctitanic on February 25, 2008 – 12:09 pm
closeThis post was published 1 year 8 months 13 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

This is a comment published today in PC World about a Federal Judge in Seattle who gave the OK to a class-action suit against Microsoft for distributing “Windows Vista Compatible” or capable labels.  

A federal judge in Seattle, Washington has given a lawsuit filed against Microsoft for its “Windows Vista Compatible” labeling program an important thumbs ups ensuring the case will move forward as a class-action.

The gist of the case is this: before Windows Vista was released, during the 2006 holiday shopping season computer manufacturers put “Windows Vista Compatible” stickers on computers that fit the hardware requirements for Windows Vista.

The catch was that most of those computers only fit the minimum system requirements for the most basic version of Vista (Vista Basic). Naturally, customers who bought a Vista compatible PC were disappointed when they found that higher-end versions of Vista didn’t work. So mad was Washington residents Dianne Kelley and Kenneth Hansen which filed a lawsuit against Microsoft alleging the Vista capable stickers were misleading.

In another part of the comment, the author says:

New PC owners were burned because they didn’t do their research before buying a computer. Why aren’t the lawyers going after the PC manufacturers who put those labels on their PCs? After all Microsoft does not actually manufacture computers.

So… who is guilty, Microsoft or OEMs? To be or not to be. Was the Windows Vista Capable label misleading?

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Tags:

ctitanic (728 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Working as IT Professional since 1994. IT Manager since 1999. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional in Tablet PC/UMPC since 2007. Owner/writer of www.ultramobilepc-tips.com . Published many articles in todoUMPC Magazine, www.todoUMPCmagazine.com, the first online magazine all about UMPCs. Maker of Tweaks2K2, a registry hacking tool for Pocket PC devices (www.tweaks2k2.com).





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.
  • kcallahan
    I put this in the same category as people who smoked for years after the warnings were put on packs of cigarettes. Then, sued the tobacco companies.

    PC companies have been doing this for years with new operating systems. When we went from WIN95 to 98, the system would work but very slow.

    Keep in mind, they may win the lawsuit. But, we'll all pay for it later.
blog comments powered by Disqus