<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google2GO!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:14:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: edge777</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/comment-page-1/#comment-3794</link>
		<dc:creator>edge777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/#comment-3794</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait til Google sues their butt off!  It&#039;s one thing using their name without permission, it&#039;s another putting out an incredibly poor software as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait til Google sues their butt off!  It&#8217;s one thing using their name without permission, it&#8217;s another putting out an incredibly poor software as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JNGold</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/comment-page-1/#comment-3791</link>
		<dc:creator>JNGold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/#comment-3791</guid>
		<description>Um...what about standard 240 x 320 which is the standard portrait mode?  The application runs terribly in this mode.  If you could make it run using 240 x 240 why then wont it run properly in portrait mode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;what about standard 240 x 320 which is the standard portrait mode?  The application runs terribly in this mode.  If you could make it run using 240 x 240 why then wont it run properly in portrait mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [program developer]</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>[program developer]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>We have released a new version of this program, 0.492B. This new version has 240x240 as well as the original 320x240 resolutions supported. We have added more Google services, and updated the icons. We also fixed the SIP issues. You can get the latest version at http://thetechturf.com/?page_id=224</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have released a new version of this program, 0.492B. This new version has 240&#215;240 as well as the original 320&#215;240 resolutions supported. We have added more Google services, and updated the icons. We also fixed the SIP issues. You can get the latest version at <a href="http://thetechturf.com/?page_id=224" rel="nofollow">http://thetechturf.com/?page_id=224</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edge777</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/comment-page-1/#comment-3760</link>
		<dc:creator>edge777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/google2go/#comment-3760</guid>
		<description>A little research before these things are posted on MobilitySite would be nice.  This product is NOT good, and it is NOT from Google.  For those considering it, check out the comments on the page site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little research before these things are posted on MobilitySite would be nice.  This product is NOT good, and it is NOT from Google.  For those considering it, check out the comments on the page site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
