<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s a bad spot on the Apple &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:03:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bollin</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3946</link>
		<dc:creator>bollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/#comment-3946</guid>
		<description>I really think this will be fixed.  The only reason why the SDK was released was because enough people complained.  I think if enough people complain about the lack of background processes, this will change also.

Also,  The &quot;no background processes&quot;only appears to be a design guideline and not an absolute technical limitation: See this link:

http://www.macrumors.com/2008/03/08/iphone-sdk-limitations-multitasking-java-emulators/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think this will be fixed.  The only reason why the SDK was released was because enough people complained.  I think if enough people complain about the lack of background processes, this will change also.</p>
<p>Also,  The &#8220;no background processes&#8221;only appears to be a design guideline and not an absolute technical limitation: See this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2008/03/08/iphone-sdk-limitations-multitasking-java-emulators/" rel="nofollow">http://www.macrumors.com/2008/03/08/iphone-sdk-limitations-multitasking-java-emulators/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edge777</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3941</link>
		<dc:creator>edge777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/#comment-3941</guid>
		<description>This is quite odd, too bad Apple does this stuff (and I&#039;m a fan).  How about all the apps that are out there right now (not the official ones) - are they able to run in the background?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite odd, too bad Apple does this stuff (and I&#8217;m a fan).  How about all the apps that are out there right now (not the official ones) &#8211; are they able to run in the background?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveGavJR</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3923</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveGavJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/#comment-3923</guid>
		<description>This is no surprise to me. Everyone knew from the start that apple was going to put limitations on their sdk. That&#039;s why apple products work so well. Rather than leave the operating system open to problems from the software, they cripple the software so it can&#039;t really affect the os. The logic is there. They&#039;re covering themselves against claims that the iphone doesn&#039;t work well because the user installed a program that is crappy and it hosed their system. This basically makes it so ANY software you installed doesn&#039;t bother the core functionality of the iphone. 

In my opinion, this is good AND bad. It&#039;s good because it ensures that the iphone will almost always work up to spec. It&#039;s also a bad thing because it renders most mobile apps useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is no surprise to me. Everyone knew from the start that apple was going to put limitations on their sdk. That&#8217;s why apple products work so well. Rather than leave the operating system open to problems from the software, they cripple the software so it can&#8217;t really affect the os. The logic is there. They&#8217;re covering themselves against claims that the iphone doesn&#8217;t work well because the user installed a program that is crappy and it hosed their system. This basically makes it so ANY software you installed doesn&#8217;t bother the core functionality of the iphone. </p>
<p>In my opinion, this is good AND bad. It&#8217;s good because it ensures that the iphone will almost always work up to spec. It&#8217;s also a bad thing because it renders most mobile apps useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haesslich</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-3918</link>
		<dc:creator>Haesslich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/03/theres-a-bad-spot-on-the-apple/#comment-3918</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;ll screw it as far as custom apps go for business.  I mean, if you made a custom interface for a certain application to work... and the program closed while you were working because you had to field a call?  Oops.

I wonder how THIS will go over with business; sure, it&#039;ll sync with Exchange via ActiveSync, but... well, it&#039;s sorta like having a Palm-based phone, but at least the Palm-based phone didn&#039;t kill the app when you had to open up the other one or take a call; it just suspended it, rather than close the application out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;ll screw it as far as custom apps go for business.  I mean, if you made a custom interface for a certain application to work&#8230; and the program closed while you were working because you had to field a call?  Oops.</p>
<p>I wonder how THIS will go over with business; sure, it&#8217;ll sync with Exchange via ActiveSync, but&#8230; well, it&#8217;s sorta like having a Palm-based phone, but at least the Palm-based phone didn&#8217;t kill the app when you had to open up the other one or take a call; it just suspended it, rather than close the application out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
