<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James needs Vista but he likes OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/05/james-needs-vista-but-he-likes-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/05/james-needs-vista-but-he-likes-os-x/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:18:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: doogald</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/05/james-needs-vista-but-he-likes-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-5275</link>
		<dc:creator>doogald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/05/james-needs-vista-but-he-likes-os-x/#comment-5275</guid>
		<description>My mother-in-law, who is a non-technical user who just switched from XP to Vista after 4 years of XP use, is ready to throw her Vista laptop out the window (pun intended.) She tried to install a Dell AIO printer that she had (which was long available by the time Vista arrived) and Vista chose the wrong driver to install. But to a novice user, it is not obvious that this is what happened - the printer was called by the name she thought she was installing and did not make it clear that it was installing a driver for a completely different printer.

But. worse than that, she recently had a boot error with unbelievable technical error messages suggesting that she do a destructive system restore. It actually only took a simple reboot for the computer to start up fine, but the error message did not suggest that she try this.

And this is my major issue with Vista - it is needlessly technical and very difficult for novice users to understand what is happening when there are problems. The Windows Defender updates do not do a resume when downloading updates if connectivity is lost - not good for a dial-up user like her, and just jaw-droppingly stupid design. 

She used Win95 for almost 10 years before switching to XP 4 years ago and had a much easier time going from 95 to XP than she has had going from XP to Vista - and that makes absolutely no sense.

OSX is not perfect, no matter what anybody says, and I suggested against a MacBook for her for the very reason that OSX was so foreign (and there is no built-in modem). But at this point I am wondering if I should have chosen OSX over Vista, if that was my only choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother-in-law, who is a non-technical user who just switched from XP to Vista after 4 years of XP use, is ready to throw her Vista laptop out the window (pun intended.) She tried to install a Dell AIO printer that she had (which was long available by the time Vista arrived) and Vista chose the wrong driver to install. But to a novice user, it is not obvious that this is what happened &#8211; the printer was called by the name she thought she was installing and did not make it clear that it was installing a driver for a completely different printer.</p>
<p>But. worse than that, she recently had a boot error with unbelievable technical error messages suggesting that she do a destructive system restore. It actually only took a simple reboot for the computer to start up fine, but the error message did not suggest that she try this.</p>
<p>And this is my major issue with Vista &#8211; it is needlessly technical and very difficult for novice users to understand what is happening when there are problems. The Windows Defender updates do not do a resume when downloading updates if connectivity is lost &#8211; not good for a dial-up user like her, and just jaw-droppingly stupid design. </p>
<p>She used Win95 for almost 10 years before switching to XP 4 years ago and had a much easier time going from 95 to XP than she has had going from XP to Vista &#8211; and that makes absolutely no sense.</p>
<p>OSX is not perfect, no matter what anybody says, and I suggested against a MacBook for her for the very reason that OSX was so foreign (and there is no built-in modem). But at this point I am wondering if I should have chosen OSX over Vista, if that was my only choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
