<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BiggEee&#8217;r?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:14:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/comment-page-1/#comment-6278</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/#comment-6278</guid>
		<description>I think the size of the Eee was the reason it was a hit.  Making it larger and slightly more expensive I think is a mistake.  At those prices, it&#039;s very tempting just to pay slightly more and get a bigger laptop.  History also hasn&#039;t been too kind to laptop of that size.  There were tablet pc&#039;s at that size that didn&#039;t sell too well.  Didn&#039;t sony also have a laptop at that size a while back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the size of the Eee was the reason it was a hit.  Making it larger and slightly more expensive I think is a mistake.  At those prices, it&#8217;s very tempting just to pay slightly more and get a bigger laptop.  History also hasn&#8217;t been too kind to laptop of that size.  There were tablet pc&#8217;s at that size that didn&#8217;t sell too well.  Didn&#8217;t sony also have a laptop at that size a while back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zealot</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/comment-page-1/#comment-6273</link>
		<dc:creator>Zealot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/#comment-6273</guid>
		<description>I have not lost all hope in Asus, but I am inclined to agree with you. They must have seen the original Eee as a shot in the dark, a way to try and make use of odd spare parts they had around. Perhaps they expected a novelty item, but never a legitimate hit.

They have lost all track of the four key traits they put into the Eee which made it succeed; Low cost, ease of use, small size and sweet/sexy form factor.

Asus created the space, perhaps it is up to someone else to continue it. They still have a chance, especially if they at least get the price factor under control, but it is fading.

Perhaps we need to look to Dell. The UMPC form seem ideal for their style and market position.

Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not lost all hope in Asus, but I am inclined to agree with you. They must have seen the original Eee as a shot in the dark, a way to try and make use of odd spare parts they had around. Perhaps they expected a novelty item, but never a legitimate hit.</p>
<p>They have lost all track of the four key traits they put into the Eee which made it succeed; Low cost, ease of use, small size and sweet/sexy form factor.</p>
<p>Asus created the space, perhaps it is up to someone else to continue it. They still have a chance, especially if they at least get the price factor under control, but it is fading.</p>
<p>Perhaps we need to look to Dell. The UMPC form seem ideal for their style and market position.</p>
<p>Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/comment-page-1/#comment-6272</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/06/biggeeer/#comment-6272</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s becoming obvious that Asus, the company that launched the subnotebook into the limelight, came out with the Eee PC by sheer luck, not a flash of brilliance. Its management can&#039;t have the least idea why this device is so popular because they have done everything that can to muck it up.

The original Eee PC was such a success because it combined easy portability with a low price. All Asus&#039; follow-up models have been larger and heavier than their predecessors, and noticeably pricier, too.

This product line is rapidly leaving the subnotebook category behind, and simply becoming yet another collection notebooks. 

I&#039;m hoping that some of Asus&#039; competitors will learn the lesson it never did. Both Dell and Acer are supposed to be coming out with inexpensive sub-notebooks; let&#039;s hope they can successfully take up the torch the Eee PC has dropped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s becoming obvious that Asus, the company that launched the subnotebook into the limelight, came out with the Eee PC by sheer luck, not a flash of brilliance. Its management can&#8217;t have the least idea why this device is so popular because they have done everything that can to muck it up.</p>
<p>The original Eee PC was such a success because it combined easy portability with a low price. All Asus&#8217; follow-up models have been larger and heavier than their predecessors, and noticeably pricier, too.</p>
<p>This product line is rapidly leaving the subnotebook category behind, and simply becoming yet another collection notebooks. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that some of Asus&#8217; competitors will learn the lesson it never did. Both Dell and Acer are supposed to be coming out with inexpensive sub-notebooks; let&#8217;s hope they can successfully take up the torch the Eee PC has dropped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
