<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTC Touch Pro Hands On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:59:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hyedipin</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/comment-page-1/#comment-6249</link>
		<dc:creator>hyedipin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/#comment-6249</guid>
		<description>Where in NY was this? I could have been there.. It sure looks big, though. If it will be as big as or as heavy as tilt, what&#039;s the purpose of getting this? SE might be a better choice if it has smooth transition from Landscape to Portrait. It just makes it looks weak against fancy transition of iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where in NY was this? I could have been there.. It sure looks big, though. If it will be as big as or as heavy as tilt, what&#8217;s the purpose of getting this? SE might be a better choice if it has smooth transition from Landscape to Portrait. It just makes it looks weak against fancy transition of iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcmatt</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/comment-page-1/#comment-6246</link>
		<dc:creator>kcmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/#comment-6246</guid>
		<description>This looks good, but I&#039;m still strongly favoring the Xperia right now for one reason... 3.5mm audio jack.  Not sure why HTC thinks making you use an adapter for your headphones is a good idea.

Oh, and I just noticed the Touch Pro doesn&#039;t run on 850 MHz!  So not really an option for those in the U.S.

I&#039;m also hoping Sony-Ericsson picks up where HTC drops the ball in areas of quality and usability (b/c HTC makes the Xperia).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks good, but I&#8217;m still strongly favoring the Xperia right now for one reason&#8230; 3.5mm audio jack.  Not sure why HTC thinks making you use an adapter for your headphones is a good idea.</p>
<p>Oh, and I just noticed the Touch Pro doesn&#8217;t run on 850 MHz!  So not really an option for those in the U.S.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also hoping Sony-Ericsson picks up where HTC drops the ball in areas of quality and usability (b/c HTC makes the Xperia).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: offbeatmammal</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/comment-page-1/#comment-6242</link>
		<dc:creator>offbeatmammal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/#comment-6242</guid>
		<description>after playing with a Diamond today (with latest ROM) i wasn&#039;t as impressed as I wanted to be. Sure it feels nice in the hand but the software was laggy - even with the uprated processor. hopefully they&#039;ll do a better job working our drivers than they did with the TyTN II (and release them!)
I hope the Touch Pro has improved.
I&#039;m actually hoping for a cross between the Diamond and the T-Mo Shadow - a T20 slide-down keypad rather than the full qwerty... I don&#039;t like having to rotate my phone to do stuff...
Personal preference I know, but it&#039;s the logical third version....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after playing with a Diamond today (with latest ROM) i wasn&#8217;t as impressed as I wanted to be. Sure it feels nice in the hand but the software was laggy &#8211; even with the uprated processor. hopefully they&#8217;ll do a better job working our drivers than they did with the TyTN II (and release them!)<br />
I hope the Touch Pro has improved.<br />
I&#8217;m actually hoping for a cross between the Diamond and the T-Mo Shadow &#8211; a T20 slide-down keypad rather than the full qwerty&#8230; I don&#8217;t like having to rotate my phone to do stuff&#8230;<br />
Personal preference I know, but it&#8217;s the logical third version&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Borders</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/comment-page-1/#comment-6233</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/06/htc-touch-pro-hands-on/#comment-6233</guid>
		<description>I like this device too. I am not though onne of the early adopters, mostly because finances won&#039;t allow it and honestly neither would my wife. I just ordered a refurb tilt from at&amp;t but maybe one day. Thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this device too. I am not though onne of the early adopters, mostly because finances won&#8217;t allow it and honestly neither would my wife. I just ordered a refurb tilt from at&#038;t but maybe one day. Thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
