Mobility Site Minute

Mobilitysite Contests

Mobility Site Videos

Mobilitysite Polls

Mobilitysite Reviews

Home » General

Microsoft Silences Critics At Last?

Posted by Zealot on June 6, 2008 – 5:21 am
closeThis post was published 1 year 5 months 21 days ago.
It\'s is possible that the information within this article is now out of date or updated.

shhh-1 The super-geniuses at Microsoft have come up with a new way to deal with a very very troublesome problem associated with mobile devices: namely how to shut them up. We have all had to deal with phones ringing in the theater, shutterbugs snapping away in museums where photos are not allowed, annoying strangers fighting on the phone while you try to sleep next door and all manners of impositions caused by a lack of phone etiquette.

Apparently, Microsoft has decided the ubiquitous requests to turn off cellphones or refrain from photography just ain’t cutting it and have proposed a patent on a system called DMP or Device Manners Policy.

The system would have a server at a location, say a concert hall, connect to any DMP enabled mobile device in the area and using DMP, disable certain functions, such as phones taking calls or cameras taking pictures. Other functions, such as checking your address book or calling 911 would not be blocked.

On the surface this seems like a elegant, simple solution to a thorny social problem. However, the ways this could be abused are legion, and there is no guarantee all device makers or even all device users would go along with it. How do you really enforce good manners?

What do you think…will you let Big Brother block your phone calls in exchange for quiet in a movie? How will this figure in the ongoing debate about the security threat in taking pictures of public areas? Many ways to look at this seemingly simple issue.

To check out the patent request, look HERE.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Tags:

Zealot (473 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

By day a department manager and writer for a major network device vendor...by night Zealot stalks the mean magnetic streets, striking fear into the hearts of bandwidth abusers and theme park mascots. Zealot has been involved with mobile devices for more than a decade now, starting off with dumb phones, moving to PDAs and then to smartphones, notebooks and netbooks with the odd PMP thrown in. Most of his mobile time currently is spent on a Treo Pro, Zune HD, Thinkpad T61, Gigabyte M912M or a Hackintoshed Compaq Mini 704. He proudly groks the Geek community and considers himself a Neo Maxi Zune Dweebie (thanks Will Wheaton!).





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.

  • Elrendhel
    If you extend the logic used here, then we should also take away EVERYONE's Drivers License, because a few fools thought erroneously that they could successfully drive while under the influence.

    Never accept an attempt to suppress your rights in the name of safety or manners. It is always better to address the actual problem at it's source. Always!

    THEATER: If a person gets a phone call and they did not shut off their ringer, then they should be escorted out of the theater. However, if they had their phone set to vibrate and they politely extract themselves from the movie audience to take the call, I likewise think that the theater management should offer the person a rain-check ticket for their use later. Or they can of course return to the audience (as if they had a bathroom break or got some popcorn).

    MUSEUM: If a person is advised of the rules regarding no picture taking, but they disregard, then Museum security to take them into custody and place them in a holding tank awaiting local law enforcement to show-up. They should be charged with destruction of private property (flashes from cameras can greatly damage paintings for example). The offender can agree to pay a fine directly to the Museum in exchange for the dropping of charges, and these fees can be used towards the future restoration of artwork jeopardized by the offender.

    There's always a way to work it out that doesn't have to drag Big Brother (or Big Business) into the equation.
  • goodguy20k
    Someone on Engadget tried to use the excuse that when emergency calls got blocked, Microsoft's pants would be sued off... A nice try, but logically, that move doesn't make sense.

    When was the last time you sat in a theater and got rudely interrupted by someone dialing 9-1-1? I think if someone's doing that, I wouldn't care to stay in the theater much longer, depending on the situation. :P Now, when was the last time you were watching a movie only to hear someone answer a phone not a few rows from you?

    And if it's personal emergencies, it really depends on how this protocol works. If it turns off the ringer (and perhaps turns on vibration), then I'm fine with that. Even better? Allow for voicemail notification (via vibration), and the calling of voicemail might even make sense. (You shouldn't need to talk to your voicemail machine. :P)

    I am quite in favor of it for safety reasons, too... If it could work within a small, confined area (which I'm not sure this technology design would, I'm mostly talking in general here, and in my above comments). I don't care who you are, why you would need to take photos in a public bathroom is beyond me. The problem, though, is that services like photo taking, are device based. Again, someone mentioned that all one would have to do is hack the firmware and who cares? If you're so evil minded to be taking stupid photos, firmware hacks to do your evil deeds are not far out of reach, I'm sure.

    So yeah, I could go either way on this. If they totally lock things down, I think they'll get sued all over the place for it. If they implement it, I could also see a lot of benefits from it. :)

    -Daniel
  • doogald
    I can go either way on this. There is nothing more embarrassing than getting a call on your phone after forgetting to silence it at a theater, but, at the same time, it seems a bit too "we know better than you". For example, I'd like my babysitter to be able to contact me if my child is having an acute health issue (though I guess that goes back to the old days of leaving the number of the restaurant or theater instead.)
blog comments powered by Disqus