<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is WM the Next Palm?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/07/is-wm-the-next-palm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/07/is-wm-the-next-palm/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:14:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c1oudrs</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/07/is-wm-the-next-palm/comment-page-1/#comment-6831</link>
		<dc:creator>c1oudrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/07/is-wm-the-next-palm/#comment-6831</guid>
		<description>Nahh.    I&#039;m  not  a  coder  so  take  what  I  saywith  a  grain  of  salt.    But  I  think  windows  mobile  is  the  way  it  is    because  of  short-sightedness  on  the  part  of  microsoft.  Realize  their  money  for  a  long  time  was  in  their  computer  end  especially  their  pc  software  end.   windows  mobile  was  a  niche  market.    Then  psychologically  decisions  and  mindsets  build  on  one  another.  &quot;Not  real  pcs&quot;  kind  of  thingg.  Before  you  know  it  the  iphones,  and  the  androids   show  up  because  of  the  vacuum  in  demand.    So  in  a  way  its  thee  same  as  palm.  However,  in  a  way  its  different.    I  dont  see  it  as  a  problem  of  3rd  party  programmers  struggling  to  support  windows  mobile  as  much  as  incompetence  on  the  part  of  microsoft  management.    Microsoft management in  my  opinion  allowed  windowsmobile  to  remain  crippled  (as  opposed  to &#039;full  fledged&#039;   XP)  because  it  was  in  their  short  term  interest  to  do  so.    So  now  microsoft  is  bei ng  outpaced  by  technology  and  competition  and  it  remains  to  be  seen  how  well  they  can  overcome  their  own  mindset.    They  have  the  resources that  palm  didnt  have.   But  microsoft  has  almost  beaten  itself  at  the  marketplace.    If  it  continues  to  beat  itself  microsoft  will  lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nahh.    I&#8217;m  not  a  coder  so  take  what  I  saywith  a  grain  of  salt.    But  I  think  windows  mobile  is  the  way  it  is    because  of  short-sightedness  on  the  part  of  microsoft.  Realize  their  money  for  a  long  time  was  in  their  computer  end  especially  their  pc  software  end.   windows  mobile  was  a  niche  market.    Then  psychologically  decisions  and  mindsets  build  on  one  another.  &#8220;Not  real  pcs&#8221;  kind  of  thingg.  Before  you  know  it  the  iphones,  and  the  androids   show  up  because  of  the  vacuum  in  demand.    So  in  a  way  its  thee  same  as  palm.  However,  in  a  way  its  different.    I  dont  see  it  as  a  problem  of  3rd  party  programmers  struggling  to  support  windows  mobile  as  much  as  incompetence  on  the  part  of  microsoft  management.    Microsoft management in  my  opinion  allowed  windowsmobile  to  remain  crippled  (as  opposed  to &#8216;full  fledged&#8217;   XP)  because  it  was  in  their  short  term  interest  to  do  so.    So  now  microsoft  is  bei ng  outpaced  by  technology  and  competition  and  it  remains  to  be  seen  how  well  they  can  overcome  their  own  mindset.    They  have  the  resources that  palm  didnt  have.   But  microsoft  has  almost  beaten  itself  at  the  marketplace.    If  it  continues  to  beat  itself  microsoft  will  lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishad</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/07/is-wm-the-next-palm/comment-page-1/#comment-6828</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/07/is-wm-the-next-palm/#comment-6828</guid>
		<description>Microsoft really dropped the ball with WM. They had such a good user base and so much potential. But year after year they&#039;ve been releasing the same old OS only with some minor and visual changes. Seems to me like they never did allocate proper budget/development to make WM better.

I still think WM can make it through. But they have to recognize the potential of mobile devices and have to come up with something good.. something significantly better than the current WM platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft really dropped the ball with WM. They had such a good user base and so much potential. But year after year they&#8217;ve been releasing the same old OS only with some minor and visual changes. Seems to me like they never did allocate proper budget/development to make WM better.</p>
<p>I still think WM can make it through. But they have to recognize the potential of mobile devices and have to come up with something good.. something significantly better than the current WM platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
