<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Touch Pro found!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:14:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AdamNimrod</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/comment-page-1/#comment-10329</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamNimrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/#comment-10329</guid>
		<description>Nah, not retarded, just skeptical/hopefull/jealous.  Thats all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, not retarded, just skeptical/hopefull/jealous.  Thats all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/comment-page-1/#comment-10328</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/#comment-10328</guid>
		<description>God, Nimrod has been spreading shit ever since I bought the thing and posted about it, it has no CMOS camera on the front so it&#039;s obviously not a Euro version flashed with an AT&amp;T ROM. I&#039;ve heard people say they prefer the numbers set in with the letters rather than at the top, I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve used any HTC full QWERTY. Don&#039;t thank Nimrod for anything, he&#039;s a retard. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, Nimrod has been spreading shit ever since I bought the thing and posted about it, it has no CMOS camera on the front so it&#8217;s obviously not a Euro version flashed with an AT&amp;T ROM. I&#8217;ve heard people say they prefer the numbers set in with the letters rather than at the top, I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve used any HTC full QWERTY. Don&#8217;t thank Nimrod for anything, he&#8217;s a retard. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/comment-page-1/#comment-10327</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/#comment-10327</guid>
		<description>Could it be a very good clone...

After looking at some pictures of the HTC branded device I see that the AT&amp;T version has no front facing camera (reminiscent of the Tilt?) and the keyboard layout is totally different. Not only are the numbers not at the top (which makes no sense) but the FN, Ctrl, WiFi buttons are in completely different locations.

I guess we will find out more when he gets the thing and does a full review on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be a very good clone&#8230;</p>
<p>After looking at some pictures of the HTC branded device I see that the AT&amp;T version has no front facing camera (reminiscent of the Tilt?) and the keyboard layout is totally different. Not only are the numbers not at the top (which makes no sense) but the FN, Ctrl, WiFi buttons are in completely different locations.</p>
<p>I guess we will find out more when he gets the thing and does a full review on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamNimrod</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/comment-page-1/#comment-10326</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamNimrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/#comment-10326</guid>
		<description>This guy also posted the same thread on the AT&amp;T forums and was very overpowering/irritating about the whole thing.

If this truly is going to be what the AT&amp;T version looks like, then I am very dissapointed in the keyboard.  I wanted all the numbers on the top row like it was designed for.

If that is an AT&amp;T ROM, maybe thats why AT&amp;T hasnt released 6.1 yet for the Tilt... they are too busy playing with the Touch Pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy also posted the same thread on the AT&amp;T forums and was very overpowering/irritating about the whole thing.</p>
<p>If this truly is going to be what the AT&amp;T version looks like, then I am very dissapointed in the keyboard.  I wanted all the numbers on the top row like it was designed for.</p>
<p>If that is an AT&amp;T ROM, maybe thats why AT&amp;T hasnt released 6.1 yet for the Tilt&#8230; they are too busy playing with the Touch Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Kortendick</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/comment-page-1/#comment-10325</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Kortendick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/#comment-10325</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, I saw the AT&amp;T on the screen and just called it &#039;branded AT&amp;T&#039;. It must have been flashed with an AT&amp;T rom and not have a sim card in the pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I saw the AT&#038;T on the screen and just called it &#8216;branded AT&#038;T&#8217;. It must have been flashed with an AT&#038;T rom and not have a sim card in the pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamNimrod</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/comment-page-1/#comment-10324</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamNimrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/att-touch-pro-found/#comment-10324</guid>
		<description>Its a pre-promo phone that is not AT&amp;T branded but it does seem to look like it runs on the AT&amp;T network... although Im not sure how sine it is displaying a &#039;no SIM card found&#039; icon.  I have no clue how it sees the AT&amp;T network when it does not have a SIM card to detect any networks.

They keyboard is also not the same as we have seen in the past for this phone (the whole reason of having 5 rows on the keyboard was to have all the numbers at the top)

My guess is either the pictures are not the actuall pictures of the phone, or something else is fishy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a pre-promo phone that is not AT&amp;T branded but it does seem to look like it runs on the AT&amp;T network&#8230; although Im not sure how sine it is displaying a &#8216;no SIM card found&#8217; icon.  I have no clue how it sees the AT&amp;T network when it does not have a SIM card to detect any networks.</p>
<p>They keyboard is also not the same as we have seen in the past for this phone (the whole reason of having 5 rows on the keyboard was to have all the numbers at the top)</p>
<p>My guess is either the pictures are not the actuall pictures of the phone, or something else is fishy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
