<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution and Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/evolution-and-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/evolution-and-life/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:12:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: siemens</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/evolution-and-life/comment-page-1/#comment-8351</link>
		<dc:creator>siemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/evolution-and-life/#comment-8351</guid>
		<description>Things are taken a bit out of perspective here. Let&#039;s look at revolutions in computer technology with widespread effect on peoples lifes (mankind in fact) during the last decades.

The PC in the mid 1980&#039;s. The World Wide Web (or the internet as we know it) in the 90&#039;s. Mobile phones in the late 90&#039;s and early 2000. GPS car navigation in the mid 2000 (but also hiking/travelling and air/sea navigation).

Where do WM fit into this? Well, it doesn&#039;t realy fit into this as an important key technology. Approximately 10% of mobile phones use a &quot;smart&quot; operating system. Approximately 10% of the smart OS&#039;es are WM. This leaves WM as a technology in approximately only 1% of the mobile consumer type devices in total. The internet, mobile phones, PCs and GPS&#039;es do extremely well without WM.

Where WM do have a mission is in integrating those technologies in small portable devices. But the fact is that WM does not do the job all that well either. Ordinary &quot;dumb phones&quot; have internet, they have email, they have GPS either built in or through BT. The reason for this is as the article say - hardware. The constraints in power consumption prevents development of general OS&#039;es that consumes huge amount of power just to tick in favour of low power consuming and lean purpose built OS&#039;es (the OS in the iPhone is probably the best visual example of a lean and mean purpose built OS, but so is S40 and all other &quot;dumb&quot; OS&#039;es).

If WM is to have any future life, one additional revolution is needed, and that revolution is in battery technology and/or low power consuming electronics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things are taken a bit out of perspective here. Let&#8217;s look at revolutions in computer technology with widespread effect on peoples lifes (mankind in fact) during the last decades.</p>
<p>The PC in the mid 1980&#8217;s. The World Wide Web (or the internet as we know it) in the 90&#8217;s. Mobile phones in the late 90&#8217;s and early 2000. GPS car navigation in the mid 2000 (but also hiking/travelling and air/sea navigation).</p>
<p>Where do WM fit into this? Well, it doesn&#8217;t realy fit into this as an important key technology. Approximately 10% of mobile phones use a &#8220;smart&#8221; operating system. Approximately 10% of the smart OS&#8217;es are WM. This leaves WM as a technology in approximately only 1% of the mobile consumer type devices in total. The internet, mobile phones, PCs and GPS&#8217;es do extremely well without WM.</p>
<p>Where WM do have a mission is in integrating those technologies in small portable devices. But the fact is that WM does not do the job all that well either. Ordinary &#8220;dumb phones&#8221; have internet, they have email, they have GPS either built in or through BT. The reason for this is as the article say &#8211; hardware. The constraints in power consumption prevents development of general OS&#8217;es that consumes huge amount of power just to tick in favour of low power consuming and lean purpose built OS&#8217;es (the OS in the iPhone is probably the best visual example of a lean and mean purpose built OS, but so is S40 and all other &#8220;dumb&#8221; OS&#8217;es).</p>
<p>If WM is to have any future life, one additional revolution is needed, and that revolution is in battery technology and/or low power consuming electronics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msliberty</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/08/evolution-and-life/comment-page-1/#comment-8339</link>
		<dc:creator>msliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/08/evolution-and-life/#comment-8339</guid>
		<description>Well put, Zealot, more and more I realize that maybe a watered down &quot;all purpose&quot; device is not as good as finding out what your needs are, and finding the right device for your own needs. Sure, I&#039;d love to replace my Axim, but not at with a toy that does not carry my computing needs. I can&#039;t tell you how many i-phone friends show me their toys telling me about features I have had on my Axim for years. Thank you, my friends, for writing about the true technology:  breakthroughs as well as standards. Msliberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put, Zealot, more and more I realize that maybe a watered down &#8220;all purpose&#8221; device is not as good as finding out what your needs are, and finding the right device for your own needs. Sure, I&#8217;d love to replace my Axim, but not at with a toy that does not carry my computing needs. I can&#8217;t tell you how many i-phone friends show me their toys telling me about features I have had on my Axim for years. Thank you, my friends, for writing about the true technology:  breakthroughs as well as standards. Msliberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
