Review: The HTC Pure (Touch Diamond2) from AT&T
October 20, 2009 – 11:39 am | Comments

Just prior to the official release of Windows Phone 6.5 on October 6th at&t released the HTC Pure which  is at&t’s version of the Touch Diamond 2. I have been using  the original Tilt …

Read the full story »
Mobility Site Minute

Check out our podcast, the Mobilitysite Minute. Quick news, views, and interviews.

Mobilitysite Contests

The lastest Mobilitysite.com Contests. What can you win today?

Mobility Site Videos

Video reviews, 1st looks, and demos of the hottest mobile devices.

Mobilitysite Polls

Our polls help get our reader’s take on what’s happening in Mobility.

Mobilitysite Reviews

Mobilitysite reviews take you deep into the hottest mobile devices, software and accessories.

Home » Smartphones

iPhone Silliness Watch

Posted by Zealot on September 23, 2008 – 4:03 pm
closeThis post was published 1 year 1 month 13 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

dt_handknit_iphone I came across another iPhone howler today, this one at Epicenter at Wired.com.

Kevin Maney wrote the following in a piece entitled Android Today, Total Upheaval in Cell Phones Tomorrow.

Actually, Android and Apple’s iPhone are early signs of a revolution.

Until now, most people have chosen their cell phones based mostly on hardware — what the phone looks like, its size, its functionality. All that is changing. People will buy phones based not on what they are, but on what they can do on the network.

As the iPhone App Store so glaringly proves, the more phones open up to developers, the more that allows users to do anything they want with their phones — much as we now do with our laptop computers.

Wow, so iPhone (launched in June of 2007) and now Android finally allow us to focus on usability, install any third party software we like onto our phones and make the phone into a proper network device…

…but haven’t we been able to do all of that on our Windows Mobile, Palm and Symbian phones for, oh gosh, like half a decade or so?

So who are the real revolutionaries?

BTW, what exactly does “People will buy phones based not on what they are, but on what they can do on the network.” mean, and how is that different from functionality?

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Zealot (444 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

By day a department manager and writer for a major network device vendor...by night Zealot stalks the mean magnetic streets, striking fear into the hearts of bandwidth abusers and theme park mascots. Zealot has been involved with mobile devices for more than a decade now, starting off with dumb phones, moving to PDAs and then to smartphones, notebooks and netbooks with the odd PMP thrown in. Most of his mobile time currently is spent on a Treo Pro, Zune HD, Thinkpad T61, Gigabyte M912M or a Hackintoshed Compaq Mini 704. He proudly groks the Geek community and considers himself a Neo Maxi Zune Dweebie (thanks Will Wheaton!).





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.
  • Another excellent example of hyperbole by some alleged tech writers who claim the iPhone was the first to do just about everything, when in fact it was not. Handango, Palmgear, Pocketgear etal had independent app stores long before the iPhone came along, and the fact the stores were not controlled by the device makers, or carriers was, and is a good thing. Also, many tech writers who should know better claim mobile Safari was the first desktop grade browser. Did they not hear of, or use NetFront, or Opera Mobile? A year before the iPhone was released, I was browsing the full desktop site for my checking account bank, and displaying copies of cancelled checks using NetFront 3.3 on a 2003 era 640 x 480 Toshiba e830 PDA The e830 had WiFi, and could easily be tethered to your phone of choice via Bluetooth. NetFront supported all required formatting, and security protocols. There was also a Flash 7 compatible client for WM. In 2004, NetFront 3.1 was included with Sony's excellent TH55 320 x 480 Palm OS PDA. The TH55 had WiFi, and also could easily be tethered to your phone of choice via Bluetooth. NetFront 3.1 did an excellent job displaying 2004 era full webpages, and still does a better job displaying generic mobile sites, and other single column pages that Safari sometimes requires horizontal scrolling to read at a comfortable text size. Heck, in 2000 using the HandSpring VisorPhone, the then new Blazer browser did a nice job on 2000 era desktop pages.

    Come on tech writing community, drink a little less Kool-Aid, and be a bit more factual, and objective in your reporting.
blog comments powered by Disqus