Celio RedFly in Action
November 7, 2009 – 9:36 pm | Comments

A few days ago I commented about the Celio Redfly adding support for BlackBerrys. I came across that bit of information first while researching to purchase a Celio RedFly myself and then while I’ve been …

Read the full story »
Mobility Site Minute

Check out our podcast, the Mobilitysite Minute. Quick news, views, and interviews.

Mobilitysite Contests

The lastest Mobilitysite.com Contests. What can you win today?

Mobility Site Videos

Video reviews, 1st looks, and demos of the hottest mobile devices.

Mobilitysite Polls

Our polls help get our reader’s take on what’s happening in Mobility.

Mobilitysite Reviews

Mobilitysite reviews take you deep into the hottest mobile devices, software and accessories.

Home » AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless

Rising Text Message rates

Posted by Radimus on September 10, 2008 – 6:47 am
closeThis post was published 1 year 1 month 27 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

In my uninformed opinion, I’d call some of this an excuse to “assist” users into buying unlimited plans and to offset users preferring to send SMS messages instead of using more expensive voice minutes.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A key member of the Senate Judiciary Committee is asking the nation’s top four wireless carriers to justify the “sharply rising rates” they charge people to send and receive text messages.

In letters to top executives at Verizon Wireless, AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp. and T-Mobile, Wisconsin Democrat Herb Kohl said Tuesday that he is concerned that rising text messaging rates reflect decreasing competition in the wireless business.

Kohl chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights. His inquiry comes as European Commission regulators are threatening to impose a cap on roaming fees for text messages sent by Europeans traveling outside of their home nations, in an effort to force prices down by as much as 70 percent.

Kohl said he was concerned that consumers are paying more than 20 cents per message, up from 10 cents in 2005. This increase, he said, “does not appear to be justified by rising costs in delivering text messages,” which are small data files that are inexpensive for carriers to transmit.

Kohl said he is particularly concerned that all four of the companies appear to have adopted identical price increases at nearly the same time. “This conduct is hardly consistent with the vigorous price competition we hope to see in a competitive marketplace,” he wrote.

Kohl also noted that these rate hikes have occurred during the industry’s recent consolidation, which has reduced the number of national wireless carriers in the U.S. to four from six. That consolidation continues, he said, as the large national wireless carriers buy out smaller, regional competitors _ as evidenced most recently by Verizon Wireless’ planned acquisition of Alltel Corp. for $5.9 billion plus the assumption of $22.2 billion in debt.

Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Group PLC, said it will respond to Kohl’s letter once it has had a chance to review it. And Sprint said “we look forward to responding to the Senator’s inquiry about the text messaging options we offer our customers and we will fully cooperate with his request.”

T-Mobile, which is owned by Deutsche Telekom AG, and AT&T did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

Link

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Radimus (65 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.
  • Pony99CA
    Oh yeah, I forgot one thing. I am glad that it's being looked into. I also wondered whether the infrastructure cost of texting has really gone up.

    Steve
  • Pony99CA
    texts are VERY lite in regards to the amount of data/time used.

    Maybe, but if texting has increased 10-fold in the last couple of years, that could be a significant enough increase justify a price increase. (I don't know if this is the case; I'm just playing a bit of Devil's Advocate here. If anybody has real numbers on texting, please let us know.)

    I’m just thinking that people are relying more on txt messages as a cheaper alternative than burning their cell minutes and the providers are seeing a drop in income… especially as they sell their plans based on lower cost minutes/bulk minute plans

    Perhaps, but I haven't exceeded my cell phone minutes in a long time on my family plan. My daughter did exceed her 250 text allotment a few times, though.

    Also, I'm not sure why somebody would use texts to offset minutes for anything but the shortest exchanges. I don't know how pre-paid plans work, but most contracts include a bunch of anytime minutes, plus free nights/weekends. So the only time texts would save is if you've reached your minute limit and are calling during peak times and either have a texting plan or the texts you use will be cheaper than the overage minutes.

    For example, overage cell phone minutes cost me $0.45, I believe. If texts cost $0.15 each sent/received, any message longer than 160 characters would get split into two and a reply acknowledging my text would break even. Anything more than would make texts more expensive than a minute of calling time. I think I could get my message out using voice in a minute or so.

    Also, I assume that anybody who does significant texting already has a text plan in place to cover their typical usage, so raising individual text message costs would only hit those who text infrequently (and therefore it wouldn't be a lot of money extra) or those who go over their texting limit.

    Finally, if this increase is to offset a loss in revenue from calling minutes, all a consumer has to do if it gets too expensive is switch to an unlimited texting plan. That will cap their losses.

    Steve
  • Radimus
    texts are VERY lite in regards to the amount of data/time used. Pictures are much larger however.

    I'm just thinking that people are relying more on txt messages as a cheaper alternative than burning their cell minutes and the providers are seeing a drop in income... especially as they sell their plans based on lower cost minutes/bulk minute plans
  • Pony99CA
    I've read that we Americans are sending more text messages than ever. I wonder if that volume is causing companies to build more capacity, thus justifying the rate increases.

    Now that most (if not all) phones allow texting, and many allow data, I'm hoping we'll see reasonably priced unified plans in the future. (And, my pet peeve, including a data option in family plans.)

    Steve
blog comments powered by Disqus