<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rising Text Message rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:10:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-8539</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/#comment-8539</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, I forgot one thing.  I &lt;strong&gt;am&lt;/strong&gt; glad that it&#039;s being looked into.  I also wondered whether the infrastructure cost of texting has really gone up.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, I forgot one thing.  I <strong>am</strong> glad that it&#8217;s being looked into.  I also wondered whether the infrastructure cost of texting has really gone up.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-8538</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/#comment-8538</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;texts are VERY lite in regards to the amount of data/time used.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Maybe, but if texting has increased 10-fold in the last couple of years, that could be a significant enough increase justify a price increase.  (I don&#039;t &lt;strong&gt;know&lt;/strong&gt; if this is the case; I&#039;m just playing a bit of Devil&#039;s Advocate here.  If anybody has real numbers on texting, please let us know.)

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’m just thinking that people are relying more on txt messages as a cheaper alternative than burning their cell minutes and the providers are seeing a drop in income… especially as they sell their plans based on lower cost minutes/bulk minute plans&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Perhaps, but I haven&#039;t exceeded my cell phone minutes in a long time on my family plan.  My daughter did exceed her 250 text allotment a few times, though.

Also, I&#039;m not sure why somebody would use texts to offset minutes for anything but the shortest exchanges.  I don&#039;t know how pre-paid plans work, but most contracts include a bunch of anytime minutes, plus free nights/weekends.  So the only time texts would save is if you&#039;ve reached your minute limit &lt;strong&gt;and&lt;/strong&gt; are calling during peak times &lt;strong&gt;and&lt;/strong&gt; either have a texting plan or the texts you use will be cheaper than the overage minutes.

For example, overage cell phone minutes cost me $0.45, I believe.  If texts cost $0.15 each sent/received, any message longer than 160 characters would get split into two and a reply acknowledging my text would break even.  Anything more than would make texts more expensive than a minute of calling time.  I think I could get my message out using voice in a minute or so.

Also, I assume that anybody who does significant texting already has a text plan in place to cover their typical usage, so raising individual text message costs would only hit those who text infrequently (and therefore it wouldn&#039;t be a lot of money extra) or those who go over their texting limit.

Finally, if this increase is to offset a loss in revenue from calling minutes, all a consumer has to do if it gets too expensive is switch to an unlimited texting plan.  That will cap their losses.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>texts are VERY lite in regards to the amount of data/time used.</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe, but if texting has increased 10-fold in the last couple of years, that could be a significant enough increase justify a price increase.  (I don&#8217;t <strong>know</strong> if this is the case; I&#8217;m just playing a bit of Devil&#8217;s Advocate here.  If anybody has real numbers on texting, please let us know.)</p>
<blockquote><p>I’m just thinking that people are relying more on txt messages as a cheaper alternative than burning their cell minutes and the providers are seeing a drop in income… especially as they sell their plans based on lower cost minutes/bulk minute plans</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps, but I haven&#8217;t exceeded my cell phone minutes in a long time on my family plan.  My daughter did exceed her 250 text allotment a few times, though.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not sure why somebody would use texts to offset minutes for anything but the shortest exchanges.  I don&#8217;t know how pre-paid plans work, but most contracts include a bunch of anytime minutes, plus free nights/weekends.  So the only time texts would save is if you&#8217;ve reached your minute limit <strong>and</strong> are calling during peak times <strong>and</strong> either have a texting plan or the texts you use will be cheaper than the overage minutes.</p>
<p>For example, overage cell phone minutes cost me $0.45, I believe.  If texts cost $0.15 each sent/received, any message longer than 160 characters would get split into two and a reply acknowledging my text would break even.  Anything more than would make texts more expensive than a minute of calling time.  I think I could get my message out using voice in a minute or so.</p>
<p>Also, I assume that anybody who does significant texting already has a text plan in place to cover their typical usage, so raising individual text message costs would only hit those who text infrequently (and therefore it wouldn&#8217;t be a lot of money extra) or those who go over their texting limit.</p>
<p>Finally, if this increase is to offset a loss in revenue from calling minutes, all a consumer has to do if it gets too expensive is switch to an unlimited texting plan.  That will cap their losses.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radimus</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-8535</link>
		<dc:creator>Radimus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/#comment-8535</guid>
		<description>texts are VERY lite in regards to the amount of data/time used.  Pictures are much larger however.

I&#039;m just thinking that people are relying more on txt messages as a cheaper alternative than burning their cell minutes and the providers are seeing a drop in income... especially as they sell their plans based on lower cost minutes/bulk minute plans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>texts are VERY lite in regards to the amount of data/time used.  Pictures are much larger however.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just thinking that people are relying more on txt messages as a cheaper alternative than burning their cell minutes and the providers are seeing a drop in income&#8230; especially as they sell their plans based on lower cost minutes/bulk minute plans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-8483</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/09/rising-text-message-rates/#comment-8483</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read that we Americans are sending more text messages than ever.  I wonder if that volume is causing companies to build more capacity, thus justifying the rate increases.

Now that most (if not all) phones allow texting, and many allow data, I&#039;m hoping we&#039;ll see reasonably priced unified plans in the future.  (And, my pet peeve, including a data option in family plans.)

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read that we Americans are sending more text messages than ever.  I wonder if that volume is causing companies to build more capacity, thus justifying the rate increases.</p>
<p>Now that most (if not all) phones allow texting, and many allow data, I&#8217;m hoping we&#8217;ll see reasonably priced unified plans in the future.  (And, my pet peeve, including a data option in family plans.)</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
