<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ah Man, Just call it the BlackJack III&#8230;. Please? Epix?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:50:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: arial</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/comment-page-1/#comment-12652</link>
		<dc:creator>arial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/#comment-12652</guid>
		<description>I was excited when I played with all the new features on this phone. It has the IM style messaging, touchscreen, optical mouse, updated windows software. I&#039;m definitely getting it soon. I think that people are stupid to so easily write it off just because it doesn&#039;t look exactly like the blackjack. I dislike blackjacks I am glad they decided to do the name change. It&#039;s much more distinguished anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was excited when I played with all the new features on this phone. It has the IM style messaging, touchscreen, optical mouse, updated windows software. I&#8217;m definitely getting it soon. I think that people are stupid to so easily write it off just because it doesn&#8217;t look exactly like the blackjack. I dislike blackjacks I am glad they decided to do the name change. It&#8217;s much more distinguished anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/comment-page-1/#comment-9779</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/#comment-9779</guid>
		<description>@nyr27ak:

&lt;blockquote&gt;And about referring to the BJ series as non-touch screen, Palm released the Treo 750 which runs Windows, that doesn’t make it any less a Treo.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That&#039;s a very good point, but I think some Palm lovers might disagree.  :D  Also, they called the first Windows Mobile the Treo 700w (&quot;w&quot; for Windows), and I think any WM Treos have a &quot;w&quot; in the model number (at least up until the Treo Pro).

&lt;blockquote&gt;Since they upgraded the OS to WM6.1 pro, they needed to change the phone to touch screen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
They could have upgraded to WM 6.1 Standard, though.

If AT&amp;T had wanted to keep the BlackJack name for branding reasons (which they apparently didn&#039;t), I would have suggested BlackJack Touch instead of BlackJack III.  That would have let people know it wasn&#039;t the same old BlackJack.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nyr27ak:</p>
<blockquote><p>And about referring to the BJ series as non-touch screen, Palm released the Treo 750 which runs Windows, that doesn’t make it any less a Treo.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a very good point, but I think some Palm lovers might disagree.  :D  Also, they called the first Windows Mobile the Treo 700w (&#8221;w&#8221; for Windows), and I think any WM Treos have a &#8220;w&#8221; in the model number (at least up until the Treo Pro).</p>
<blockquote><p>Since they upgraded the OS to WM6.1 pro, they needed to change the phone to touch screen.</p></blockquote>
<p>They could have upgraded to WM 6.1 Standard, though.</p>
<p>If AT&amp;T had wanted to keep the BlackJack name for branding reasons (which they apparently didn&#8217;t), I would have suggested BlackJack Touch instead of BlackJack III.  That would have let people know it wasn&#8217;t the same old BlackJack.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyr27ak</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/comment-page-1/#comment-9700</link>
		<dc:creator>nyr27ak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/#comment-9700</guid>
		<description>I believe that this is the Blackjack III. I work for AT&amp;T and up until the phone was released, we heard it referred to as the Blackjack III. There have been rumors of a Blackjack III though. Who knows, the Epix is a great phone and I can&#039;t wait to use one full time. And about referring to the BJ series as non-touch screen, Palm released the Treo 750 which runs Windows, that doesn&#039;t make it any less a Treo. Since they upgraded the OS to WM6.1 pro, they needed to change the phone to touch screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that this is the Blackjack III. I work for AT&amp;T and up until the phone was released, we heard it referred to as the Blackjack III. There have been rumors of a Blackjack III though. Who knows, the Epix is a great phone and I can&#8217;t wait to use one full time. And about referring to the BJ series as non-touch screen, Palm released the Treo 750 which runs Windows, that doesn&#8217;t make it any less a Treo. Since they upgraded the OS to WM6.1 pro, they needed to change the phone to touch screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/comment-page-1/#comment-9022</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/#comment-9022</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh well, so much for what everyone believed to be the “BlackJack III“. Can’t we just stick with a naming scheme?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I didn&#039;t believe it.  The BlackJack series are &lt;strong&gt;non-touch&lt;/strong&gt; devices.  Calling this the BlackJack III would be misleading.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh well, so much for what everyone believed to be the “BlackJack III“. Can’t we just stick with a naming scheme?</p></blockquote>
<p>I didn&#8217;t believe it.  The BlackJack series are <strong>non-touch</strong> devices.  Calling this the BlackJack III would be misleading.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the undude</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/comment-page-1/#comment-9019</link>
		<dc:creator>the undude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/10/ah-man-just-call-it-the-blackjack-iii-please-epix/#comment-9019</guid>
		<description>so, no omnia for at&amp;t.  erm, i mean no touch screen competition to the iphone... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, no omnia for at&amp;t.  erm, i mean no touch screen competition to the iphone&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
