Celio RedFly in Action
November 7, 2009 – 9:36 pm | Comments

A few days ago I commented about the Celio Redfly adding support for BlackBerrys. I came across that bit of information first while researching to purchase a Celio RedFly myself and then while I’ve been …

Read the full story »
Mobility Site Minute

Check out our podcast, the Mobilitysite Minute. Quick news, views, and interviews.

Mobilitysite Contests

The lastest Mobilitysite.com Contests. What can you win today?

Mobility Site Videos

Video reviews, 1st looks, and demos of the hottest mobile devices.

Mobilitysite Polls

Our polls help get our reader’s take on what’s happening in Mobility.

Mobilitysite Reviews

Mobilitysite reviews take you deep into the hottest mobile devices, software and accessories.

Home » General

Motorola Bets on Android

Posted by Zealot on October 22, 2008 – 11:38 am
closeThis post was published 1 year 16 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

motorola-logo Motorola has always been one of my favorite mobile phone vendors so I have felt somewhat bereft as the company has slowly fallen pray to it’s own hesitancy and miss-steps. There was a time when Moto made high status phones. I remember when the Star-Tac was the phone to own. Then the RAZR came and changed the game. It was such a monster hit that the company decided they could just keep making slight variations on the phone forever…as the industry rushed past them.

The Q line are solid phones, but there is no doubt the shift in the industry towards smartphones and away from chic feature phones left Motorola high and dry. A new direction was badly needed, but over the last year Moto has just produced more RAZR and ROKR retreads. Music and Camera phones won’t save the once proud company.

Therefore I was overjoyed to read some time ago that Motorola was moving wholeheartedly into the Googlephone camp. More information is now surfacing, like this tidbit found in Business Week

In the next year, social networking phones are expected to be a hit with the 16- to 34-year-old crowd, analysts say. According to consultancy Informa (INF), the number of mobile social-networking users will rise from 2.3% of global cell-phone users at the end of 2007 to as many as 23% of all mobile users by the end of 2012.

The Android handset will feature a touch screen about the size of those on Apple’s (AAPL) iPhone, people familiar with the phone say. While it takes some of the design cues from Krave ZN4, the first touch-screen phone from Motorola launched with Verizon Wireless on Oct. 14, it’s not certain whether the Android phone screen will feature Krave’s distinctive and interactive clear flip screen.

Like the world’s first Android phone, from HTC, Motorola’s Android-based device will offer a slide-out Qwerty keyboard.

From the description, and the Social Networking angle this is another Android phone that will get no love in the enterprise, but that isn’t a bad thing. Apple has certainly proven there is gold in the consumer smartphone market.

While I still prefer WM, Motorola needs to break into new territory and I think an Android phone is a great choice for them. Hopefully this new direction will lead to a company saving success.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Tags:

Zealot (446 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

By day a department manager and writer for a major network device vendor...by night Zealot stalks the mean magnetic streets, striking fear into the hearts of bandwidth abusers and theme park mascots. Zealot has been involved with mobile devices for more than a decade now, starting off with dumb phones, moving to PDAs and then to smartphones, notebooks and netbooks with the odd PMP thrown in. Most of his mobile time currently is spent on a Treo Pro, Zune HD, Thinkpad T61, Gigabyte M912M or a Hackintoshed Compaq Mini 704. He proudly groks the Geek community and considers himself a Neo Maxi Zune Dweebie (thanks Will Wheaton!).





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.
  • Pony99CA
    My point was that as the industry was changing, Motorola kept making variations on the RAZR and didn’t produce any signifigant new designs. Even most of the new phones were very RAZR-esque.

    Yes, in feature phones, they weren't innovating as much. However, they did release the Q series of smart phones, and well before Apple released the iPhone or Android was even announced, so I wouldn't say they were caught "high and dry".

    As far as I know, the Q series has done fairly well. It wasn't the "BlackBerry killer" people hyped, but I think it's still pretty cool. As I mentioned, I bought a Q and upgraded to a Q9m, so I put my money behind that statement. It may not be enough to save the business, but it's not a bad start.

    I find it very interesting that Motorola was one of the few major phone producers that didn’t push out an “iPhone Killer”. While not being derivitive is a good thing, I feel it was more a failure in the company’s will to compete. They seemed to think the iPhone and it’s clone would just go away and they could keep making more RAZRettes.

    I won't pretend to know what Motorola is thinking. Should they try to address the iPhone like Samsung, LG, Sony Ericsson, etc. have done? Maybe, maybe not. Given their current situation, maybe it couldn't hurt.

    However, let's see if Apple innovates on the iPhone line or keeps producing variations on a theme. Do you think Apple can keep the iPhone line popular with only the one form factor three years from now?

    Even RIM is finally releasing other BlackBerry form factors, like the Storm and Kickflip (or whatever they're called). I think that excitement (and their new consumer marketing) is part of what propelled RIM ahead of Microsoft in smart phones.

    Steve
  • Zealot
    My point was that as the industry was changing, Motorola kept making variations on the RAZR and didn't produce any signifigant new designs. Even most of the new phones were very RAZR-esque.

    I find it very interesting that Motorola was one of the few major phone producers that didn't push out an "iPhone Killer". While not being derivitive is a good thing, I feel it was more a failure in the company's will to compete. They seemed to think the iPhone and it's clone would just go away and they could keep making more RAZRettes.

    Yes, Motorola was a key player in early smartphones, then they remained tied to a hit feature phone for too long and lost their hold on the market. My point was not that the lack of a smartphone killed them, it was that a loss of connection to what the market wanted and a lack of recent innovation ensured their decline.

    Z
  • Pony99CA
    The Q line are solid phones, but there is no doubt the shift in the industry towards smartphones and away from chic feature phones left Motorola high and dry.

    I'm not sure I follow that logic. The Q series seems fairly well done (I bought an original and upgrade to a Q9m).

    Also, remember that Motorola was an early player in the Smartphone market with the Mpx200 line. They also devised the innovative Mpx dual-flip phone (although I'm not sure if it ever got officially released; there were units out there, though).

    Based on financial results, Motorola certainly needs to get its act together, but I don't think their lack of smart phones is the reason.

    Steve
blog comments powered by Disqus