<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mobile G1 review &#8211; Engadget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/t-mobile-g1-review-engadget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/t-mobile-g1-review-engadget/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:20:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ctitanic</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/t-mobile-g1-review-engadget/comment-page-1/#comment-9204</link>
		<dc:creator>ctitanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/10/t-mobile-g1-review-engadget/#comment-9204</guid>
		<description>My point is that they could have been doing a lot better with a better appealing phone. ;)
To me, what they have done is a marketing mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that they could have been doing a lot better with a better appealing phone. ;)<br />
To me, what they have done is a marketing mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doogald</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/10/t-mobile-g1-review-engadget/comment-page-1/#comment-9203</link>
		<dc:creator>doogald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/10/t-mobile-g1-review-engadget/#comment-9203</guid>
		<description>Well, even if this device is not as compelling as it could have been, I would hardly characterize this as a &quot;mistake&quot;. Google is large enough that they can introduce an imperfect first phone while they continue to work with other partners on better solutions. I&#039;d agree if Google had only a single shot at making this work, if Android were already established and this was the first of a new version, but as an introduction I think that they will be ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, even if this device is not as compelling as it could have been, I would hardly characterize this as a &#8220;mistake&#8221;. Google is large enough that they can introduce an imperfect first phone while they continue to work with other partners on better solutions. I&#8217;d agree if Google had only a single shot at making this work, if Android were already established and this was the first of a new version, but as an introduction I think that they will be ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
