<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile 6.5 &#8211; Coming in 2009!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:42:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9630</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/#comment-9630</guid>
		<description>@Gil Bouhnick:

&lt;blockquote&gt;As we learned by now, those things are always an indication that something is truly happening.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think writers on the site disagree.  See all the controversy when it was rumored that WM 7 would be delayed.  Somebody at HTC had claimed WM 7 devices would be out in 2009, but other people said WM 7 slipping wasn&#039;t a big deal because Microsoft hadn&#039;t announced anything.

Also, I&#039;m not sure 6.5 wasn&#039;t already known about before Jha&#039;s comments.  I&#039;d seen rumors about WM 6.2 before that, so I&#039;m wondering if 6.2 and 6.5 are really the same thing.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gil Bouhnick:</p>
<blockquote><p>As we learned by now, those things are always an indication that something is truly happening.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think writers on the site disagree.  See all the controversy when it was rumored that WM 7 would be delayed.  Somebody at HTC had claimed WM 7 devices would be out in 2009, but other people said WM 7 slipping wasn&#8217;t a big deal because Microsoft hadn&#8217;t announced anything.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not sure 6.5 wasn&#8217;t already known about before Jha&#8217;s comments.  I&#8217;d seen rumors about WM 6.2 before that, so I&#8217;m wondering if 6.2 and 6.5 are really the same thing.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCMatt</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9616</link>
		<dc:creator>KCMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/#comment-9616</guid>
		<description>If it includes full and seamless integration with Mesh it will also be well worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it includes full and seamless integration with Mesh it will also be well worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radimus</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9610</link>
		<dc:creator>Radimus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 02:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/11/windows-mobile-65-coming-in-2009/#comment-9610</guid>
		<description>if it fixes issues with muliple sync partners and WMP metadata corruption, it will be well worth it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it fixes issues with muliple sync partners and WMP metadata corruption, it will be well worth it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
