<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Speaks to Goldman, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:52:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/comment-page-1/#comment-14157</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/#comment-14157</guid>
		<description>This is way past ridiculous.  Give it a LONG break.  It is insane to say that APPLE should respond to these unsubstantiated rumors.  Just because people keep talking about this (continually), doesn&#039;t make them true.  Apple could create a whole company that could be devoted to squashing these rumors, but to what avail.  It would still be just a rumor.  The fact that people in the Stock Exchange have given these rumors leverage against Apple is bad.  THAT is my two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is way past ridiculous.  Give it a LONG break.  It is insane to say that APPLE should respond to these unsubstantiated rumors.  Just because people keep talking about this (continually), doesn&#8217;t make them true.  Apple could create a whole company that could be devoted to squashing these rumors, but to what avail.  It would still be just a rumor.  The fact that people in the Stock Exchange have given these rumors leverage against Apple is bad.  THAT is my two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doogald</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/comment-page-1/#comment-14117</link>
		<dc:creator>doogald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/#comment-14117</guid>
		<description>Steve Jobs has responded to them before, and I am sure that he is quite weary of them. I know that I would be. And there is no good reason that affects the stock price. The stock price in the long term will reflect the company&#039;s results, and short-term swings due to rumors (both up and down) will just disappear over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Jobs has responded to them before, and I am sure that he is quite weary of them. I know that I would be. And there is no good reason that affects the stock price. The stock price in the long term will reflect the company&#8217;s results, and short-term swings due to rumors (both up and down) will just disappear over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whydidnt</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/comment-page-1/#comment-14111</link>
		<dc:creator>whydidnt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/#comment-14111</guid>
		<description>The problem with responding to rumors is once they respond to one, then they need to respond to them all.  If they respond this time, then they have to the next time a rumor comes out, related or not, or people will assume since they don&#039;t deny it, it must be true.  

This (and concerns over SEC investigations) are why companies don&#039;t typically respond to rumors.  It gets messy quick if you have to start responding to rumors, some of which may be true, but should not be public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with responding to rumors is once they respond to one, then they need to respond to them all.  If they respond this time, then they have to the next time a rumor comes out, related or not, or people will assume since they don&#8217;t deny it, it must be true.  </p>
<p>This (and concerns over SEC investigations) are why companies don&#8217;t typically respond to rumors.  It gets messy quick if you have to start responding to rumors, some of which may be true, but should not be public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenBurritto</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/comment-page-1/#comment-14108</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenBurritto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/12/apple-speaks-to-goldman-again/#comment-14108</guid>
		<description>LEAVE JOBS ALONE!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEAVE JOBS ALONE!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
