Celio RedFly in Action
November 7, 2009 – 9:36 pm | Comments

A few days ago I commented about the Celio Redfly adding support for BlackBerrys. I came across that bit of information first while researching to purchase a Celio RedFly myself and then while I’ve been …

Read the full story »
Mobility Site Minute

Check out our podcast, the Mobilitysite Minute. Quick news, views, and interviews.

Mobilitysite Contests

The lastest Mobilitysite.com Contests. What can you win today?

Mobility Site Videos

Video reviews, 1st looks, and demos of the hottest mobile devices.

Mobilitysite Polls

Our polls help get our reader’s take on what’s happening in Mobility.

Mobilitysite Reviews

Mobilitysite reviews take you deep into the hottest mobile devices, software and accessories.

Home » Smartphones

Is that a Blackberry in your Pocket…PC?

Posted by Chris Leckness on December 18, 2008 – 12:15 am
closeThis post was published 10 months 20 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

Sorry, couldn’t resist.

dsc00845 According to berryreview.com (who got the news pics from a tipster) you will soon have the option of running the Blackberry OS as an application on your Windows Mobile device.

This is what RIM is officially calling the BlackBerry Application Suite which we told you about in the past that is posed to replace the aging BlackBerry Connect. Essentially the BlackBerry OS is running as an application on Windows Mobile virtualizing the BlackBerry OS. From what I can tell this will have all of the BlackBerry 4.2 OS features in it.

I can certain see where there would be some people that would love this, but I don’t think I would be too nuts about it.  Obviously this will give companies the option to buy either a Blackberry or a Windows Mobile device, but is there really much advantage?  I know our IT guys would not want to have to support a virtual BB app on a second platform when you can just buy the Blackberry.  This is more likely to appeal to individuals that have to use Blackberry for work but are willing and able to buy their own device and expense it.

Am I missing anything with the above statement?

The obviously additional point here is that Windows Mobile can now do the same stuff using an Exchange server, so it isn’t like the only option for companies is the Blackberry server.

Source: berryreview.com

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Chris Leckness (3530 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Chris Leckness is the Owner/Administrator of Mobilitysite. He is a Microsoft MVP, Mobile Devices and a member of the exclusive focus group, Mobius. Chris runs a Mobilitysite, GotZune, and a few other smaller sites and blogs. His personal blog is chris.leckness.com.





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.
  • Pony99CA
    I suspect they're doing this to keep the (presumably) lucrative server business in companies. If companies are switching to Windows Mobile devices (and, given the relative sales of BlackBerry vs. WM devices lately, I'm not sure that's true), RIM wouldn't want to lose the BlackBerry Enterprise Server business to Exchange, too. Maybe this could be enough to prevent IT switching from BES to Exchange.

    Steve
blog comments powered by Disqus