<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is that a Blackberry in your Pocket&#8230;PC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/is-that-a-blackberry-in-your-pocketpc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/is-that-a-blackberry-in-your-pocketpc/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:25:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2008/12/is-that-a-blackberry-in-your-pocketpc/comment-page-1/#comment-13621</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2008/12/is-that-a-blackberry-in-your-pocketpc/#comment-13621</guid>
		<description>I suspect they&#039;re doing this to keep the (presumably) lucrative server business in companies.  If companies are switching to Windows Mobile devices (and, given the relative sales of BlackBerry vs. WM devices lately, I&#039;m not sure that&#039;s true), RIM wouldn&#039;t want to lose the BlackBerry Enterprise Server business to Exchange, too.  Maybe this could be enough to prevent IT switching from BES to Exchange.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect they&#8217;re doing this to keep the (presumably) lucrative server business in companies.  If companies are switching to Windows Mobile devices (and, given the relative sales of BlackBerry vs. WM devices lately, I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s true), RIM wouldn&#8217;t want to lose the BlackBerry Enterprise Server business to Exchange, too.  Maybe this could be enough to prevent IT switching from BES to Exchange.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
