Mobility Site Minute

Mobilitysite Contests

Mobility Site Videos

Mobilitysite Polls

Mobilitysite Reviews

Home » General

Browsing the Web on Windows Mobile

Posted by Chris Leckness on January 4, 2009 – 12:06 pm  Share
closeThis post was published 10 months 16 days ago.
It\'s is possible that the information within this article is now out of date or updated.

Menneisyys has posted another one of his famous comparisons in the forums. This time it’s an in depth look at Mobile Browsers for Windows Mobile. Right now his images are missing, but you can still read the review.

After purchasing an iPhone 3G, I immediately fell in love with Safari, its Web browser. Granted, it’s somewhat less capable as the best, comparable Windows Mobile titles (no Flash, no page saving, no copy/paste, no Opera Link, no explicit text size settings, no caching etc.) and, from time to time, it crashes even with the last, 2.2 firmware version, but it’s still much better usable and much faster than anything on Windows Mobile.

Needless to say, seeing the immense success and popularity of iPhone’s Safari, Windows Mobile software developers followed suit and, for quite some time now, have been trying to simulate the interface and easy controllability of Safari. Sure, they can’t circumvent the problems caused by the hardware (namely, the resistive touchscreen, which, in cases, require a lot of pressure, unlike on the capacitive iPhone); nevertheless, the Windows Mobile developers have indeed managed to come up with some really decent alternatives.

In this roundup, I mostly explain how current Windows Mobile Web browsers are able to provide the same user experience as Safari on the iPhone (again, apart from the much inferior hardware, touchscreen-wise). There have been several shots of providing the same; see for example THIS and, most importantly, THIS articles. The latter article, unfortunately, severely lacks in that it only compares Internet Explorer Mobile and Opera Mobile 9.5 – read: no SkyFire, no Iris, no NetFront, no Opera Mini. In addition, the date of the article also shows that it doesn’t test the latest Explorer Mobile 6 and the latest, further enhanced builds of Opera Mobile.

Read on to read the rest of his review…

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm Post to StumbleUpon

Chris Leckness (3547 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Chris Leckness is the Owner/Administrator of Mobilitysite. He is a Microsoft MVP, Mobile Devices and a member of the exclusive focus group, Mobius. Chris runs a Mobilitysite, GotZune, and a few other smaller sites and blogs. His personal blog is chris.leckness.com.





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.

  • I think Doogald meant that Skyfire runs on WM Standard. I've been running it on my Motorola Q9m for some time now.

    Steve
  • Menneisyys
    Yeah, SkyFire is a bit slow when it comes to zooming / scrolling. This is why I've also given it a "Slow" mark in the "Scrolling speed" row - while all the other browsers received (much) better marks.
  • doogald
    Actually, I've been running Skyfire for quite a while. I'm not all that impressed - when you zoom in the text is blurry until it clears up to a point where it is annoying. And I'm really not all that wild about using a proxy service like that to log in to web sites. If I'm going to use something like that, Opera Mini is so much more usable.
  • Menneisyys
    1, thanks for the frontpage :) I've just posted a reworked version with a separate Verdict section, a lot more info on the different OpMob "rips", how IEM6 should be evaluated etc.

    2, there isn't much to report on since my last WM Standard-specific WinMo Web Browsers bible article (see http://www.mobilitysite.com/boards/applications... ). Currently, Opera 9.5x has no WM Standard-compliant version. Neither does SkyFire or Iris support it. That is, the situation hasn't changed much.
  • doogald
    This was good, but it would also be great to highlight the differences in Windows Mobile Standard, which, of course, also lacks cut and paste, does not support the Opera Mobile 9.5 beta yet, etc.

    (No, I am not volunteering. I have my phone just the way I want it and I'm not installing another thing on it...)
  • Wow - what an amazingly detailed roundup! Extremely helpful. Thanks so much, Menneisyys, for your usual thoroughness!
blog comments powered by Disqus