<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Windows Mobile 6.5 Screen-shots leaked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:14:34 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zealot</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-14957</link>
		<dc:creator>Zealot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/#comment-14957</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling the font looks off due to the localization, since it is clearly running a Chinese version of the OS. The English font on Chinese language devices always look like Courier gone bad. I won&#039;t judge the look until I see it in a proper English language ROM.

My greater worry is that the options and information on the Today screen seems confusing and arbitrary. Likely a poor usabuility factor, less then WM6.1 from the look of i. I can&#039;t imagine they would backtrack in this version (though I am not expecting major steps forward till 7). I am hoping this mess is due to the Chinese version, or user customization.

Time will tell...

Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling the font looks off due to the localization, since it is clearly running a Chinese version of the OS. The English font on Chinese language devices always look like Courier gone bad. I won&#8217;t judge the look until I see it in a proper English language ROM.</p>
<p>My greater worry is that the options and information on the Today screen seems confusing and arbitrary. Likely a poor usabuility factor, less then WM6.1 from the look of i. I can&#8217;t imagine they would backtrack in this version (though I am not expecting major steps forward till 7). I am hoping this mess is due to the Chinese version, or user customization.</p>
<p>Time will tell&#8230;</p>
<p>Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starkenator</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-14954</link>
		<dc:creator>Starkenator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/#comment-14954</guid>
		<description>This looks awful! So much for bringing people over from the Zune team. If this is the direction Windows Mobile is going I see a Pre in my future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks awful! So much for bringing people over from the Zune team. If this is the direction Windows Mobile is going I see a Pre in my future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doogald</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-14951</link>
		<dc:creator>doogald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/01/first-windows-mobile-65-screen-shots-leaked/#comment-14951</guid>
		<description>It cannot possibly be as ugly as those last four screen shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It cannot possibly be as ugly as those last four screen shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
