<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is that windows Mobile 6.5 running on HTC Touch Pro?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:52:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: breley</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-15160</link>
		<dc:creator>breley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/#comment-15160</guid>
		<description>That honeycomb quasi-UI looks too much like one of those oldAvalon Hill military strategy boardgames. For a moment I thought your Today icon was going to assault the entrenched Contacts group. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That honeycomb quasi-UI looks too much like one of those oldAvalon Hill military strategy boardgames. For a moment I thought your Today icon was going to assault the entrenched Contacts group. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timi</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-15151</link>
		<dc:creator>timi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/#comment-15151</guid>
		<description>i believe that the 6.5 isn&#039;t necessary b4 7.0 because a lot might not like it based on the fact that it isn&#039;t much different from 6.0 and 6.1. Not to say that what I see isn&#039;t good, its a good facelift if I may say. I hope it has more fluidity and smoothness than the 6.1. Also I hope it has better portability of manufacturer input also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe that the 6.5 isn&#8217;t necessary b4 7.0 because a lot might not like it based on the fact that it isn&#8217;t much different from 6.0 and 6.1. Not to say that what I see isn&#8217;t good, its a good facelift if I may say. I hope it has more fluidity and smoothness than the 6.1. Also I hope it has better portability of manufacturer input also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neko</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/comment-page-1/#comment-15134</link>
		<dc:creator>Neko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/01/is-that-windows-mobile-65-running-on-htc-touch-pro/#comment-15134</guid>
		<description>I hope these are only dummy images, because the looks of it seem rushed, ugly, the text is hard to read with the background and it simply looks amateurish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope these are only dummy images, because the looks of it seem rushed, ugly, the text is hard to read with the background and it simply looks amateurish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
