Mobility Site Minute

Mobilitysite Contests

Mobility Site Videos

Mobilitysite Polls

Mobilitysite Reviews

Home » General

Tim Cook Gets Feisty

Posted by Zealot on January 22, 2009 – 1:50 am  Share
closeThis post was published 10 months 1 day ago.
It\'s is possible that the information within this article is now out of date or updated.

iphone-timcook Of course, when you are in the process of announcing a 10 BILLION DOLLAR quarter, the largest in company history, you can be forgiven for doing a little strutting.

In Apple’s earning’s call, COO Tim Cook took some time out from dignified crowing to shoot down a couple long standing rumors (no nothing about Steve Job’s health, thank God) and do some interesting posturing.

First the rumors…the ballyhooed iPhone Nano was buried once and for all, with Cook making clear that Apple will never go the WinMo route of one OS on many different devices. Stating that it is better for developers, he said that Apple will stick with a single device and keep it’s legendarily closed ecosystem closed for the foreseeable future…save of course for all the officially derided but sometimes tacitly condoned hackintoshs out there. Specifically he said…

Software is the key ingredient, and we believe that we are years ahead of our competitors. Having different screen sizes, different input methods, and different hardware makes things difficult for developers.

No word on how arbitrary and arcane application approval processes DON’T make things hard on developers, but hey, at least they approved the iFart.

Then, following the official Doctrine of Steve, Scientist he shot down the somewhat pie in the sky dreams of a Mac Netbook in the near future, saying…

Right now, from our point of view, the products in there are principally based on hardware that’s much less powerful than we think customers want, software technology that is not good, cramped keyboards, small displays. Et cetera. We don’t think that people are going to be pleased with those type of products. But we’ll see…

How this jives for the enormous sales and popularity of Netbooks I am not sure, since it is clear that such views aren’t held by a massive slice of the market. Of course, he may be describing the reactions of just the Apple faithful, which may be who he means when he says “People”. Personally, I think that Apple is still making a mistake about this. Netbooks are being accepted more and more as a “second or third computer” in support of a larger more powerful main machine. I doubt I would ever consider buying an Apple as my main computer, but a lower cost, limited functionality Mac NetBook? I would absolutely pick one up just to play with it. As for the cannibalizing problem which is a legitimate concern for a luxury product company like Apple, simply spike the OS and make it clearly less capable then the full OS on a proper MacBook. Limit functionality to what suits the size and niche and see what happens. An entry level Mac may just sell the OS to doubters and pennypinchers and actually increase the sales of their more expensive machines.

And what about the posturing? Cook took a few shots at those companies he says may be poaching on the iPhone patents, saying they will absolutely be met in court. All pundits agree he means Palm, specifically the multitouch screen on the Palm Pre. I find this interesting as this is the first iPhone rival Apple has bothered to even notice, let alone threaten. Sounds like Palm is definitely onto something here. It is going to be an interesting few months in the smartphone world.

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm Post to StumbleUpon

Tags:

Zealot (473 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

By day a department manager and writer for a major network device vendor...by night Zealot stalks the mean magnetic streets, striking fear into the hearts of bandwidth abusers and theme park mascots. Zealot has been involved with mobile devices for more than a decade now, starting off with dumb phones, moving to PDAs and then to smartphones, notebooks and netbooks with the odd PMP thrown in. Most of his mobile time currently is spent on a Treo Pro, Zune HD, Thinkpad T61, Gigabyte M912M or a Hackintoshed Compaq Mini 704. He proudly groks the Geek community and considers himself a Neo Maxi Zune Dweebie (thanks Will Wheaton!).





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.

  • Software is the key ingredient, and we believe that we are years ahead of our competitors. Having different screen sizes, different input methods, and different hardware makes things difficult for developers.

    So making things easier for developers is more important than pleasing customers?

    Were Windows Mobile programs better when developers only had to support 240x320 portrait QVGA screens? Yes, supporting the various resolutions makes software somewhat more difficult to write, but developers are smart people....

    And, if an iPhone nano was basically just a shrunken iPhone, the developers wouldn't have to do anything. They might want to lay out some items differently to make them more readable on a smaller screen, but allowing that to be configured by a user regardless of hardware is a good idea (for accessibility reasons).

    Right now, from our point of view, the products in there are principally based on hardware that’s much less powerful than we think customers want, software technology that is not good, cramped keyboards, small displays.

    Cramped keyboards and small displays like, um, [cough]the iPhone[cough]? Or is Apple saying there's really no middle ground between a laptop and a phone?

    I suspect doogald has the right idea....

    Steve
  • doogald
    I think the thing about lawsuits and Pre is not so much with its potential for success but with the fact that a former Apple executive who (I think) for a time managed the iPhone development, Jon Rubinstein, hired away a lot of his former employees at Apple who worked on the iPhone.

    As for the Netbook, Apple's pooh-poohing sounds a lot like the pooh-poohing that they did for the three years that they were working on the iPhone. I am sure that they are working on something, but I agree with Apple - if they cannot get it priced competitively enough (i.e., less than $500), they may not do well in the category.

    I thought another key quote was that Apple was interested in selling the best phone, not turning over the most units.
blog comments powered by Disqus