<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Phase for Windows Mobile?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:03:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zealot</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-15398</link>
		<dc:creator>Zealot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/#comment-15398</guid>
		<description>Yeah....but it&#039;s fun to type.

Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;.but it&#8217;s fun to type.</p>
<p>Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-15380</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/#comment-15380</guid>
		<description>One might cogitate on the shibboleth that utilizing sesquipedalian verbiage like &quot;Gotterdammerung&quot; tends to obfuscate rather than enlighten, especially when not ubiquitous.  Is its employment engaging in schadenfreude or, perhaps more detrimental, the floccinaucinihilipilification of the audience not knowledgeable about the Wagnerian Ring Cycle?  Such usage might even be yclept jejune if exaggerated.  :D

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might cogitate on the shibboleth that utilizing sesquipedalian verbiage like &#8220;Gotterdammerung&#8221; tends to obfuscate rather than enlighten, especially when not ubiquitous.  Is its employment engaging in schadenfreude or, perhaps more detrimental, the floccinaucinihilipilification of the audience not knowledgeable about the Wagnerian Ring Cycle?  Such usage might even be yclept jejune if exaggerated.  :D</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the undude</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-15348</link>
		<dc:creator>the undude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/02/the-next-phase-for-windows-mobile/#comment-15348</guid>
		<description>yes.  windows 7 was always intended as the convergence platform, at least since windows mobile 5.0 came out that has been known as the intended direction.

but would you new buy a phone because it&#039;s &#039;converged&#039; with your laptop?  maybe.  maybe not.   &#039;convergence&#039; of email and contacts has been a strength of winmo phones that apple and google have coveted with activesync licencing.

still, i think the winmo platform will have to succeed on its own merits, and not because of it being a pc in your pocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes.  windows 7 was always intended as the convergence platform, at least since windows mobile 5.0 came out that has been known as the intended direction.</p>
<p>but would you new buy a phone because it&#8217;s &#8216;converged&#8217; with your laptop?  maybe.  maybe not.   &#8216;convergence&#8217; of email and contacts has been a strength of winmo phones that apple and google have coveted with activesync licencing.</p>
<p>still, i think the winmo platform will have to succeed on its own merits, and not because of it being a pc in your pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
