<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile 6.5 Video from Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:40:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren Humphries</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-15443</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/#comment-15443</guid>
		<description>That would be an incomplete OS (still in Alpha) that is running on an emulator.  I think we can expect things to be a bit better at launch.  MS has been rolling out progressively better versions of Windows Mobile for a very long time and I am sure they won&#039;t let us down.

Remember when Palm started showing off its new OS?  That was VERY sluggish and is already much better.  I think you can cut MS some slack on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be an incomplete OS (still in Alpha) that is running on an emulator.  I think we can expect things to be a bit better at launch.  MS has been rolling out progressively better versions of Windows Mobile for a very long time and I am sure they won&#8217;t let us down.</p>
<p>Remember when Palm started showing off its new OS?  That was VERY sluggish and is already much better.  I think you can cut MS some slack on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave s</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-15442</link>
		<dc:creator>dave s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/#comment-15442</guid>
		<description>even on this promo video things look choppy
that&#039;s a major embarrassment in my book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even on this promo video things look choppy<br />
that&#8217;s a major embarrassment in my book</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Humphries</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-15432</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Humphries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/02/windows-mobile-65-video-from-microsoft/#comment-15432</guid>
		<description>YAY!!  WM 6.5 looks like it is exactly what was needed.  Now WM will really showcase its strengths.  WM is so much more complete than iPhone and others and with this improved UI we can be proud to show it off.  Gotta save my pennies for Q4!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY!!  WM 6.5 looks like it is exactly what was needed.  Now WM will really showcase its strengths.  WM is so much more complete than iPhone and others and with this improved UI we can be proud to show it off.  Gotta save my pennies for Q4!  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
