Review: The HTC Pure (Touch Diamond2) from AT&T
Mobilitysite Reviews »
Review: The HTC Pure (Touch Diamond2) from AT&T
October 20, 2009 – 11:39 am | Comments

Just prior to the official release of Windows Phone 6.5 on October 6th at&t released the HTC Pure which  is at&t’s version of the Touch Diamond 2. I have been using  the original Tilt …

 Read the full story »
Mobility Site Minute

Check out our podcast, the Mobilitysite Minute. Quick news, views, and interviews.

Mobilitysite Contests

The lastest Mobilitysite.com Contests. What can you win today?

Mobility Site Videos

Video reviews, 1st looks, and demos of the hottest mobile devices.

Mobilitysite Polls

Our polls help get our reader’s take on what’s happening in Mobility.

Mobilitysite Reviews

Mobilitysite reviews take you deep into the hottest mobile devices, software and accessories.

Home » CTIA Wireless

Southwest Airlines, Surprise Mobility….

Posted by Chris Leckness on April 5, 2009 – 12:49 pm
closeThis post was published 7 months 3 days ago which may make its actuality or expire date not be valid anymore. This site is not responsible for any misunderstanding.

So, I use Southwest Airlines for a couple reasons when i fly to Vegas. The main reason is the direct flight from Birmingham to Vegas and the other is the fact that they are one of the last airlines left that do not charge for luggage. I got ready to fly home from Vegas last night and I was bummed with the Michigan St. vs Uconn game starting. We got on the plane a couple minutes into the game. We got airborne and 10 minutes later, we got an announcement that just added a 3rd reason to fly Southwest, IN FLIGHT WIFI…

Wifi In flight WiFi Wifi 2
Brochure in the seat pouch, WiFi found at 10k feet, Live Basketball in flight!!!

Yes, In Flight WiFi. The 1st thing I did was popped onto my iPhone to check it out, I took the middle snapshot, uploaded it to Flickr and then tweeted about the coolness of in flight WiFi. Then I realized… MARCH MADNESS (in April). I jumped over to CBSSportsline.com and caught the end of the 1st game and we (myself and passengers in seats around me) watched the 1st half of the North Carolina vs Villanova game before we touched down in Birmingham. Too Cool!

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Digg Post to Facebook

Tags: , ,

Chris Leckness (3527 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Chris Leckness is the Owner/Administrator of Mobilitysite. He is a Microsoft MVP, Mobile Devices and a member of the exclusive focus group, Mobius. Chris runs a Mobilitysite, GotZune, and a few other smaller sites and blogs. His personal blog is chris.leckness.com.


Related Posts




You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.
  • Colin G
    Steve,

    The inflight restriction of cellular phones originates from the FCC. As you point out the cell phone contacts too many towers and transitions between them too fast. Cell service wasn't designed for this, and it can tie up too much cell network resources. Additionally the cell phone has to transmit at a higher power, and the cacophony of transmissions inside the plane has the outside possibility of disrupting navigation instruments.

    Wifi signals have been extensively tested onboard aircraft and haven't caused identifiable problems. Cell service has been tested with "pico base stations," where the cell phone can operate at its lowest transmit power to the base station onboard the aircraft. The pico station then retransmits the signal outside the aircraft to a network designed for high speed traveling signals. This has also tested safe for aircraft instruments. Lack of interest in the service has prevented a wide roll-out by any US airlines.
  • @Walter:

    Actually, I wasn't talking about using cell phones for talking (hence my reference to "cellular devices"). I was thinking about tethering my cell phone to my laptop for Internet access access without having to pay for in-flight WiFi.

    If they allow WiFi radios during the flight, why not cellular radios? (I've heard about issues like hitting too many cell towers or moving between them too fast, but that's an issue for the carriers, not the airline.)

    Steve
  • Walter
    I personally wouldn't want them to allow cell calls on the plane, can you imagine 100 people all on their phones at the same time in a confined space. I'd go nuts! Wifi on the otherhand, for web browsing is relatively quiet.
  • If it's $2 per hour or less, I'd consider it. If they want some outrageous fee like $25 per trip, I wouldn't (unless I had to do business).

    However, this begs the question. If we can have relatively high-powered WiFi radios on in the plane, can we have low-powered cellular devices on now? (And would they work?)

    Steve
  • If there are now three, it is a sign of expansion. As of mid-March, the crew was proud of being on the only one.

    Thanks for the update.
  • It was free, but I fear it will cost if it goes live. The flight attendant was asking me a bunch a questions and one of them is if I would be willing to pay if they had it and charged. I answered, depends on the length of the flight and if basketball was on. :) Then I said, really though, it would depend on the length.
  • onus
    Ike,
    There are 3 planes in the pilot program. If it is rolled fleet wide, there almost certainly will be a fee for 2 reasons. The Wifi satellite antenna increases fuel burn considerably. Southwest is under considerable pressure to raise revenue, which on a percentage basis is well down the last several years. They loath to raise prices and damage their low fare reputation. Wifi would likely be used to close this revenue gap.
  • KCMatt
    Chris- was it free?

    This is awesome... I hope it becomes standard.
  • Chris, I was lucky enough to be on that same route in mid-March. I tweeted from the WiFi on my Tilt, while my wife checked her gmail from the Asus!

    For all the salivating, though, this is a pilot program, and there is only one plane in the Southwest fleet that is so equipped. Once they know more about the bandwidth demand and such, they can proceed with outfitting the rest.

    It wouldn't surprise me that once in-flight WiFi becomes more available, that there will be a charge. And with it being Southwest, it also wouldn't surprise me if it ends up being free.
  • THIS idea, as well as the willingness to hold fast on Not charging customers for baggage, is/are the kinds of things that makes me want to be loyal to a company. It's the kind of thing I don't know why more companies don't get. Yes, you CAN nickle and dime me at every opportunity if you so desire, but at what cost? Is it going to cost you a little to give me something like free Wi-Fi (which I seriously doubt) or is it going to cost you A LOT in loyalty or complaint to not do so? Other companies and industries should take a lesson. Greed has become rampant in more areas than just banking or insurance or pharmaceuticals. It's time for more companies to stand up and be leaders by example. Think we, the consumer, doesn't notice or care how we are treated? Think again. Maybe you're paying a very high price for carrying your own baggage, Corporate America.
  • Walter
    That's great news Chris. I use Southwest a couple of times a year, wifi would keep me occupied while flying.

    I didn't see anything about it on the Southwest website.
blog comments powered by Disqus