<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Text Messages are limited to 160 Characters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/</link>
	<description>Mobile News, Reviews, and Views.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:24:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CodeBubba</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-16535</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeBubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/#comment-16535</guid>
		<description>Steve,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well yeah ... you&#039;re right, 8-bits can hold 256 discrete values but I said 255 characters because 0 is considered the null-character in the ASCII character set.  When constructing string characters (in languages such as &#039;C&#039;) the null character (0) is never considered part of the string, it is used as the string terminator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Well yeah &#8230; you&#39;re right, 8-bits can hold 256 discrete values but I said 255 characters because 0 is considered the null-character in the ASCII character set.  When constructing string characters (in languages such as &#39;C&#39;) the null character (0) is never considered part of the string, it is used as the string terminator.</p>
<p>-bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony99CA</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-16528</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony99CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/#comment-16528</guid>
		<description>The 8-bit/7-bit difference makes sense.  I always assumed (not having ever used Twitter) that they stuck some additional information in the message (the sender&#039;s ID, perhaps).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, 8 bits can represent 256 characters, not 255.  (I wouldn&#039;t say &quot;display&quot; because many of the ASCII characters aren&#039;t really displayable -- 0-31 and 255, if I recall correctly.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8-bit/7-bit difference makes sense.  I always assumed (not having ever used Twitter) that they stuck some additional information in the message (the sender&#39;s ID, perhaps).</p>
<p>Of course, 8 bits can represent 256 characters, not 255.  (I wouldn&#39;t say &#8220;display&#8221; because many of the ASCII characters aren&#39;t really displayable &#8212; 0-31 and 255, if I recall correctly.)</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeBubba</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-16523</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeBubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/#comment-16523</guid>
		<description>srvctec,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My guess is that Twitter decided to allow for the extended character set.  Notice that in the article he described how they got it up to 160-characters, they went with a 7-bit character set instead of 8-bit.  An 8-bit character set can display 255 different characters whereas a 7-bit one is limited to 128.  By doing the 7-bit characters, they can be bit-encoded (Multiplexed) for transmission and De-Multiplexed (unpacked) at the receiving end; but you can&#039;t use any of the upper 128 in the SMS system.  For most routine text messaging no one misses those anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-CB :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>srvctec,</p>
<p>My guess is that Twitter decided to allow for the extended character set.  Notice that in the article he described how they got it up to 160-characters, they went with a 7-bit character set instead of 8-bit.  An 8-bit character set can display 255 different characters whereas a 7-bit one is limited to 128.  By doing the 7-bit characters, they can be bit-encoded (Multiplexed) for transmission and De-Multiplexed (unpacked) at the receiving end; but you can&#39;t use any of the upper 128 in the SMS system.  For most routine text messaging no one misses those anyway.</p>
<p>-CB :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srvctec</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-16516</link>
		<dc:creator>srvctec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilitysite.com/2009/05/why-text-messages-are-limited-to-160-characters/#comment-16516</guid>
		<description>Very interesting!  I&#039;ve always wondered this myself, but never got around to checking into it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here&#039;s a question for you- why in the world did Twitter decide on a limit of 140 characters when the devices used to make that message, i.e. cell phone text messages, have a limit of 160 characters?  I just don&#039;t get it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just an FYI- I had to use IE to log in here, since Firefox 3.0.10 wouldn&#039;t ever show me as logged in even though I tried it 4 or 5 times- just kept taking me back to the log in screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting!  I&#39;ve always wondered this myself, but never got around to checking into it.</p>
<p>Here&#39;s a question for you- why in the world did Twitter decide on a limit of 140 characters when the devices used to make that message, i.e. cell phone text messages, have a limit of 160 characters?  I just don&#39;t get it.</p>
<p>Just an FYI- I had to use IE to log in here, since Firefox 3.0.10 wouldn&#39;t ever show me as logged in even though I tried it 4 or 5 times- just kept taking me back to the log in screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
