Mobility Site Minute

Mobilitysite Contests

Mobility Site Videos

Mobilitysite Polls

Mobilitysite Reviews

Home » AT&T, General

AT&T Coverage Comparisons

Posted by Marilyn Torres on July 20, 2009 – 9:22 am  Share
closeThis post was published 4 months 4 days ago.
It\'s is possible that the information within this article is now out of date or updated.

During my most recent mini-road trip up the scenic A1A on the eastern coast of Florida to St. Augustine, my AT&T Tilt couldn’t offer me more than one and a half bars. Once I got to my destination I thought my bars would come back to normal, since I’m used to constant HSDPA speeds in Central Florida. As it turns out, my phone maintained about three bars of reception on Edge throughout St. Augustine and St. Augustine Beach, and I could forget about actually having anything more than two bars inside the hotel. The recent coverage study conducted by Novarum and published in PC World pretty much vindicates my coverage experience:AT&T

The AT&T network’s 13-city average download speed in our tests was 812 kbps. Its average upload speed was 660 kbps. Reliability was an issue in our experience of the AT&T system: Our testers were able to make a connection at a reasonable, uninterrupted speed in only 68 percent of their tests.

During my vacation, I would hop on Wi-Fi every chance I got because phone calls quickly became an unobtainable dream indoors.  Text messaging was still semi-reliable but any kind of data transfer would have to come through the hotel Wi-Fi.  An AT&T press release in May promised to start speed upgrades and widening coverage by nearly doubling its wireless spectrum to 3G speeds in most metropolitan areas by the end of this year for completion in 2011. I don’t want to leave the good customer service I’ve enjoyed at AT&T for almost ten years because of coverage issues when I travel. Plus, having a GSM phone that can be used abroad is a huge perk. I suppose as long as my coverage remains high on a day-to-day basis at work, home, and in-between I won’t be leaving AT&T any time soon, but my highest expectation for the network for starters is to at least retain 3G speeds when traveling in-state.

Source: PC World

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Ping.fm Post to StumbleUpon

Tags:

Marilyn Torres (39 Posts) - Website | Twitter | Facebook

Marilyn Torres is a contributing blogger for Mobility Site. She also blogs about movies, books, comics, and recipes at her personal blog, marit.vox.com. Marilyn has a Bachelor of Arts in English and currently lives with her other half, Cavalier-Poodle, and tabby cat in Central Florida.





You can also participate in other conversation in our active forums with 200,000 other Members. It only takes 2 minutes to sign up one time for free in the forums.

  • bill
    I agree. However my Wilson ibooster works great.
  • So, does this mean that we should all switch to Sprint or T-Mobile?
  • Name
    Im not sure that the article you site really makes your case. First - you were not in one of the markets mentioned. Second - how were those particular markets chosen? What was the selection criteria? Is there an inherent bias in the selection? I don't know - the article doesn't state how they were chosen.

    Also you mention difficulty while going up the A1A. The PC World article says NOTHING about coverage between markets.

    I really think you missed the mark here. To make your case you really needed a much more comprehensive study than the one presented in PC World. It may have matched your experience, but that's more a matter of coincidence than empirical data.

    The PC World article, especially inthe sidebar about how the tested, does describe a lot of potential problems with their testing and why your results may differ - factors that couldn't really be worked consistently into their results, so be careful when drawing conclusions from this limited study. Your mileage is likely to vary greatly!
blog comments powered by Disqus