View Single Post
Old 03-31-08, 12:57 PM   #12 (permalink)
CodeBubba
Aximsite Veteran
 
CodeBubba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,800
Location: DeLand, FL
PDA: iPaq hx2495b
Phone: RAZR V3M
Carrier: Verizon
PMP: iPaq hx2495b
iTrader Rating: (0)
Awards Showcase
Aximsite Active Silver Member: Given to all active members (3 years and over 1,500 posts) - Issue reason: Milestone reached 
Total Awards: 1
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
View MyPDA
Originally Posted by Clegs View Post
Sorry CodeBubba, I know VB.net very well also but I was responding to oversteve who sounds like he is stumbling around in it... From my experience (I may not have 30 years but I do have experience) C based languages are much easier for people to learn. When I said stumble around I meant learn on your own. You can't deny that most .NET applications are written in C#, most programming books are in C#, you have java, javascript, actionscript, and many more languages based off of the c syntax. I think it's very worthwhile for every developer to learn how to get around in c style code.

B^)
No problem.

No doubt, learning C-like languages is a good idea but that they are "easier" is debatable. Let's just agree to disagree about that.

As far as books go, I've found an adequate number of them using both languages. Seems to depend on the type of subject-matter. I might say that "most" are C#, but I wouldn't say that's a large "most". From what I've found at the bookstore in recent days it might be 55/45 in favor of C#.

Either languages is fine, really - particularly in .Net. They both do, essentially, the same thing.

-CB
__________________
General Aviation is not the stepchild of modern aviation... it is the Father. - Unknown

If five-million people do a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Ancient Chinese Proverb
CodeBubba is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote