Mobility Site - View Single Post

mbloof · 11-15-06, 09:36 AM

Greetings...

I've followed this thread with minor interest....

It all comes down to ODDS.

1. Odds are, that if there was room for a USB host, Dell would of populated it and it would of been included as a feature of the 50/51.

2. Given that it is NOT a feature, the ODDS that there is room to route the traces to TESTPOINTS on the PCB is 50/50 (if the PCB is designed for ICT, the pads would be there), however, I do not see enough testpoints on ETHER side of the PCB for ICT.

11-15-06, 09:36 AM	#121 (permalink)
mbloof Aximsite Rookie Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Oregon Posts: 30 Device: Sanyo 8200 Carrier: Sprint Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Greetings... I've followed this thread with minor interest.... It all comes down to ODDS. 1. Odds are, that if there was room for a USB host, Dell would of populated it and it would of been included as a feature of the 50/51. 2. Given that it is NOT a feature, the ODDS that there is room to route the traces to TESTPOINTS on the PCB is 50/50 (if the PCB is designed for ICT, the pads would be there), however, I do not see enough testpoints on ETHER side of the PCB for ICT. __________________ [FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=Blue] - Mark0 (The Technologist)