Thread: allofmp3.com
View Single Post
Old 03-21-07, 01:49 PM   #11 (permalink)
ya1950
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I can't contribute to the direction this thread is taking since I don't use either service. I can comment on your original question:

Originally Posted by matt_90048 View Post
So I guess to be more specific, my question is whether transcoding from 384kbit/s free format to 320 mp3 format going to produce significantly lower quality of music as compared to ripping a CD directly into 320 mp3 format?
From the Wiki:

Compression artifacts are cumulative, therefore transcoding between lossy codecs causes a progressive loss of quality with each successive generation. For this reason, it is generally discouraged unless unavoidable. For instance, if an individual owns a digital audio player that does not support a particular format (e.g., Apple iPod and Ogg Vorbis), then the only way for the owner to use content encoded in that format is to transcode it to a supported format. It is better to retain a copy in a lossless format (such as TTA, FLAC or WavPack), and then encode directly from the lossless source file to the lossy formats required.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcoding

My understanding is that better to rip from CD directly rather than transcode from a higher to a lower bitrate.
  Reply With Quote