View Single Post
Old 03-24-07, 02:06 PM   #6 (permalink)
Eric12341
Aximsite Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Zion,IL
Posts: 1,585
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Active Bronze Member 
Total Awards: 1

Originally Posted by Haesslich View Post
Honestly, I wouldn't say that WMA SAVES CPU cycles - they're smaller, but that also means you spend a bit more time (CPU time) decoding.
Yes it does I've experiemented with it before, all the times I used wma the speed NEVER went above 312mhz whereas with .mp3 the lowest it went was 416mhz,sure it only uses 2 more minutes on the pc to convert but its worth it and ull be able to fit more files.
Eric12341 is offline   Reply With Quote