Mobility Site - View Single Post

AMike · 07-24-04, 04:15 AM

Hey, I was wondering if you have some numbers to show that Divx needs less processor power than wmv... I'm genuinely curious since I thought the original divx (years ago) was just a hacked verson of wmv to encode to avis...

Thanks, and sorry about the sync issues - I think some versions of DVD2AVI have problems, but if you use that link I provided it should fix that. If you're already using that, then I have no idea really...

EDIT: nevermind, I thought you meant playback... DivX does indeed take less to encode.

07-24-04, 04:15 AM	#11 (permalink)
AMike Aximsite Rookie Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 33 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Hey, I was wondering if you have some numbers to show that Divx needs less processor power than wmv... I'm genuinely curious since I thought the original divx (years ago) was just a hacked verson of wmv to encode to avis... Thanks, and sorry about the sync issues - I think some versions of DVD2AVI have problems, but if you use that link I provided it should fix that. If you're already using that, then I have no idea really... EDIT: nevermind, I thought you meant playback... DivX does indeed take less to encode. Last edited by AMike; 07-24-04 at 02:05 PM.