Mobility Site - View Single Post

08-03-04, 12:01 PM

I have the exact opposite opinions:

(1) Installs completely to SD card, so no memory is used ... cache is stored on SD (again no memory)

(2) Uses a little more system memory when running compared to PIE (I wouldn't call it a hog though)

(3) Is much faster at rendering than PIE (The startup nag screen is annoying however)

(4) Has numerous enhancements (too many to mention) that make it a more robust browser.

(5) It is a little overpriced however. (I purchased a while back at a discounted price).

Obviously my opinion. Just amazed how different the opinions
are.

Whatever makes you happy . . .

08-03-04, 12:01 PM	#7 (permalink)
KPDUTY Guest Posts: n/a	I have the exact opposite opinions: (1) Installs completely to SD card, so no memory is used ... cache is stored on SD (again no memory) (2) Uses a little more system memory when running compared to PIE (I wouldn't call it a hog though) (3) Is much faster at rendering than PIE (The startup nag screen is annoying however) (4) Has numerous enhancements (too many to mention) that make it a more robust browser. (5) It is a little overpriced however. (I purchased a while back at a discounted price). Obviously my opinion. Just amazed how different the opinions are. Whatever makes you happy . . . Last edited by KPDUTY; 08-03-04 at 12:05 PM.