View Single Post
Old 12-30-04, 09:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Howard2k
Aximsite Legend
 
Howard2k's Avatar
Addicted Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 13,721
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Active Silver Member Moderator Medal Silver Poster 
Total Awards: 3

You would probably find that re-ripping (not converting) to ogg at 160Kb/s would sound as good as 192Kb/s MP3. AAC is another alternative that also typically seems to perform better than MP3.
__________________
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.
Howard2k is offline   Reply With Quote