|
Originally Posted by irwin2
|
1. Compare codecs in this same conditions - adjusting brightness provides to better quality in encoded material - more about this you read on doom9
2. For me xvid 1.1MBps is better then 1.7mbps - sharp, detailed
3. Movie in 1.7Mbps takes 50% more space then xvid 1.1Mbps.
|
Ok, I can make the same with no gamma correction, but it will not change the results.
I agree with you, but again (for the fouth time) it was not the point of the thread to compare Xvid and MPEG-1.
Some companies want to use MPEG-1 rather than Xvid because they don't want to pay patent royalties or risk liability. The point was to show that it's possible to do VGA res with MPEG-1 at 1.7 Mbps or less with excellent quality.
Of course individual users don't care about liability, patent royalties and IP issues, and in that case clearly it's better for them to use Xvid.