|
>The purpose of this thread was only to discuss ways to make very high quality MPEG's.
1.7Mbps is a very High Quality Mpeg's? and in VGA res? Are you kidding? :)
>I don't think Xvid looks good in VGA at less than 1 Mbps, but it's a question of what you consider good.
It's yours opinion. My is totally different.
> Of course, you can invert the way to compute percentage,....
But on axim x50v, on SD or CF card very important thing is a size.
>> Yes. But still for what? why? 1Gb movie mpeg1 looks worse then 700Mb Xvid. More space and worse quality.
> No, they would look about the same.
It's yours opinion. My is totally different. Try to compress whole 5th element (with sound) on 976Mb SD card. I bet - Xvid is much better in 700MB.
And from your last post "it was not the point of the thread to compare Xvid and MPEG-1." What's the point of this thread? to make high quality mpeg's? What's related with x50v? Try to doom9 on mpeg1 section.
--------------
@PocketTV Team: "Ok, I can make the same with no gamma correction, but it will not change the results."
@Enragin Angel: "I don't see adjusting brightness as better quality"
1. Human eye tends to notice encoding errors less if they happen in dark or bright parts of the picture.
2. Even results is small - Always compare in this same conditions.
|