|
> 1.7Mbps is a very High Quality Mpeg's? and in VGA res? Are you kidding? :)
It is possible to make high quality MPEG in VGA resolution at 1.7 Mbps. There very few visible artifacts and blocking visible of the v3 sequence.
> It's yours opinion. My is totally different. Try to compress whole 5th element (with sound) on 976Mb SD card. I bet - Xvid is much better in 700MB.
I did. It looks perfect in MPEG, but you are correct, it is 30% larger than Xvid.
> And from your last post "it was not the point of the thread to compare Xvid and MPEG-1." What's the point of this thread? to make high quality mpeg's?
No, it was to make high quality mpeg's in VGA resolution (specifically) and with low bitrate.
> What's related with x50v?
The x50v has a VGA resolution display.
> 1. Human eye tends to notice encoding errors less if they happen in dark or bright parts of the picture.
Since there are less dark areas in our MPEG sample (which is brighter), it would make encoding error more visible, yet I clearly see more artifacts in the low-bitrate, darker Xvid version.
|