View Single Post
Old 08-05-05, 12:50 AM   #13 (permalink)
axim_wannabe
Aximsite All Star
 
axim_wannabe's Avatar
Super Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 691
Device: Sharp WS004SH
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Silver Contributors 
Total Awards: 1

Originally Posted by coolabah
I wonder how this would work with an incremental back-up; to me there just seems so much more to go wrong- so much seems kinda quirky and unstable at the best of times in a PPC if releability or ease of use is affected then this would be no use to me, personally. If not, then great. Another 30 seconds of my life to waste at will ! :approve:
yes - for something that performs already at 100% reliability for one minute - do you think a software developer would risk making it perform in 30 seconds and not sure of the reliablity?

for one, backing up an entire set of files is MUCH FASTER (especially for a small sized amount like a few MBs) than (1) finding which ones have changed, (2) creating a list of that has changed, and (3) backing up from that list and making sure that it changes those specific files inside the ARCHIVE set...

but yes, incremental backup has its advantages (as a previous post has mentioned) - for say, a TERABYTE HDD...

axim_wannabe is offline   Reply With Quote