View Single Post
Old 10-09-05, 08:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
axim_wannabe
Aximsite All Star
 
axim_wannabe's Avatar
Super Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 691
Device: Sharp WS004SH
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Silver Contributors 
Total Awards: 1

why isnt WM5 more backward-compatible than it should be?

there is this other thread that somehow sparked some inquisitive nature, and it being being off-topic, id like to move it over here...

http://www.aximsite.com/boards/showt...d=1#post854134
http://www.aximsite.com/boards/showt...d=1#post854136
http://www.aximsite.com/boards/showt...d=1#post854137
http://www.aximsite.com/boards/showt...d=1#post854152

it is basically trying to answer why the Windows Mobile Team never tried to exert a little extra effort in making their OS more backwards-compatible than it should be...

we have a change in CPUs, apps dont work... we have a change in OS, apps dont work... moreso the long line from WinCE to Palm-size PC to HPC to WM2003SE, and now to WM5...

i mean, what would happen to our software investments if each and every two years that a new OS comes up, we have to buy upgrades?

as ive mentioned in my previous posts (noted above), my ol' MS-DOS 6.0-based apps still work with my WinXP Pro SP2 setup...

what gives? is this, as I see it, more greed?

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

- aka ipaq_wannabe @
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

- aka clie_wannabe @
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

- aka JadeShadow @
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
:rolling:
axim_wannabe is offline   Reply With Quote