Mobility Site - View Single Post - why isnt WM5 more backward-compatible than it should be?

stevenshytle · 10-09-05, 10:37 PM

I use to be part of a forum for the Casio E-100 (1999) on WinCE 2.11 and there were discussions similar to this and the answer broke down to stability/speed/memory. By getting rid of as much backwards compatibility as possible in theory in makes the OS more stable, smaller install, etc.

10-09-05, 10:37 PM	#3 (permalink)
stevenshytle Aximsite Rookie DAP Freshman Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Kentucky Posts: 34 Device: Mogul Carrier: Sprint Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	I use to be part of a forum for the Casio E-100 (1999) on WinCE 2.11 and there were discussions similar to this and the answer broke down to stability/speed/memory. By getting rid of as much backwards compatibility as possible in theory in makes the OS more stable, smaller install, etc. __________________ Courage and GodSpeed!