Hey guys nice thread, did anyone check out my post at
http://www.aximsite.com/boards/showthread.php?t=100546 ?
This thread confirms some of the feedback I had been getting and that is picking the newer larger "faster" SD/CF cards is a tough task. As I stated in that thread I have been out of the market for awhile and the latest data I had looked at was around Choirguy's pdf time maybe a little later. Of course ROM revision have changed, sizes of cards have changed and the tech seems to have changed.
Is it the larger size(diff tech perhaps) or the FAT32 vs. FAT16 or what that makes the 4GB cf and 2GB SDs trudge along compared to the 2GBCF and 1GB SDs? Seems to be a FAT32 thing as the A-data 2GB isn't a size issue for FAT16 no?
Right now for the 4GB Cf I am considering the Kingston Elite but of course that is only based on data of how the 2GB performed on CG's pdf. That logic if of course faultly as the A-data 1GB sd really moved along and the 2/4GB models trudged along. As for a 2GB sd no direction there either as already mentioned performance is device specific so most reviews information is irrelevant unless was done on an Axim X50v A05 firmware.