View Single Post
Old 10-12-05, 06:44 PM   #9 (permalink)
gabextremev200
Aximsite Minor League
 
gabextremev200's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 218
Device: DuraCellPhone (lies)
Carrier: Carrier:Manual Labor
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh, I guess there were some posts I missed! (should have refreshed!) Well, hm... that's a good idea. Re-encoding... thanks, I'll try it out on these clips, lol.

Quote:
you don't see those ugly blocks on the PC, do you? and you see those ugly blocks on your x50v.

the reason?

simple. all divx (or xvid) movies are encoded at 24 bit color depth.
I guess you have a point there, but when you decode with Raw Framebuffer, the video looks just like the original, even without dithering.
If only "Intel 2700G" looked as good as Raw Framebuffer.

When I use TCPMP's "Raw Framebuffer," the clips look so similar to the originals on the PC that I really can't tell the difference if you were to give me screenshots! Especially with dithering. But when the decoder has anything to do with "2700G," the colors are thrown out of whack and there is blocking, etc. If Raw Framebuffer and i2700G look the same to you, I think its a problem with my particular decoder.

The problems with just sticking to Raw Framebuffer are:
1. At least 3 times slower than "Intel 2700G"
2. Screen tearing problems
3. "Reduce LCD Tearing" option slows it down even more
__________________
--THE GABEXTREME--

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by gabextremev200; 10-12-05 at 06:55 PM.
gabextremev200 is offline   Reply With Quote