Mobility Site - View Single Post - Question Regarding Complaints about WM 5 Performace Compared to 2003 SE?

paul_loren · 11-03-05, 03:53 PM

OK many posts are complaining about the performance issue of WM 5 comapre to WM 2003 SE.
Why would that be?
Is it because WM5 is a dog or because of Persistant data Storage.

With my current X50V 2003 SE I install all programs into BIS, nothing is installed into RAM.

In my case should I see performance about equal, worse, or better.

Just got my CD but haven't upgraded yet.

Thanks

11-03-05, 03:53 PM	#1 (permalink)
paul_loren Aximsite Minor League Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Where ever My PPC GPS Takes Me Posts: 164 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Question Regarding Complaints about WM 5 Performace Compared to 2003 SE? OK many posts are complaining about the performance issue of WM 5 comapre to WM 2003 SE. Why would that be? Is it because WM5 is a dog or because of Persistant data Storage. With my current X50V 2003 SE I install all programs into BIS, nothing is installed into RAM. In my case should I see performance about equal, worse, or better. Just got my CD but haven't upgraded yet. Thanks Last edited by paul_loren; 11-03-05 at 04:03 PM.